2002
DOI: 10.1590/s0001-37652002000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constant mean curvature one surfaces in hyperbolic 3-space using the Bianchi-Calò method

Abstract: In this note we present a method for constructing constant mean curvature on surfaces in hyperbolic 3-space in terms of holomorphic data first introduced in Bianchi's Lezioni di Geometria Differenziale of 1927, therefore predating by many years the modern approaches due to Bryant, Small and others. Besides its obvious historical interest, this note aims to complement Bianchi's analysis by deriving explicit formulae for CMC-1 surfaces and comparing the various approaches encountered in the literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of the usual Bryant representation formula, we use the BianchiCalò method to represent a Bryant surface which is homeomorphic to a region in C [6]. Let f = f (z) be a holomorphic map defined in a region Ω ⊂ C, and let…”
Section: Bianchi-calò Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead of the usual Bryant representation formula, we use the BianchiCalò method to represent a Bryant surface which is homeomorphic to a region in C [6]. Let f = f (z) be a holomorphic map defined in a region Ω ⊂ C, and let…”
Section: Bianchi-calò Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, ∂ ∞ H 3 is one of the two envelopes of S f (z) . The second envelope gives a Bryant surface whose gauss map is f [6].…”
Section: Bianchi-calò Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small in [11] with techniques of algebraic geometry. However, in implicit form it can be found in the classical book [2] of L. Bianchi where its derivation was based on geometric ideas concerning congruences of spheres and the rolling of pairs of isometric 232 H. GOLLEK surfaces in R 3 on each other (see also [10]). The following algebraic formula is quoted from [11]:…”
Section: Given a Null Curve F =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Finally, a modification of A. Small's formula (see [11], [10] or [13]) leads to an algebraic formula BS : (f , g) ∈ A Σ × A Σ → N Σ depending on two arguments. For this purpose a partial operation between null curves is defined, assigning to any pair (F 1 , F 2 ) of null curves such that their Bryant data g 1 and g 2 (i.e., the first arguments of (1.1)) are equal, a new null curve BS f ,g = F 1 (F 2 ) −1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In §6 we explain how to derive this duality from the correspondence for null curves in C 4 . For other recent derivations, see [4], [7] and [8]. (For basic information about constant mean curvature 1 surfaces in H 3 , in addition to [1], one should consult the seminal papers of Umehara and Yamada and their coauthors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%