2023
DOI: 10.1590/2675-2824071.22104jpo
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the trophic role of pelagic fishes and fishery landings shifts in the South Brazil Bight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, they fed on other carangids and clupeiformes as found in some previous trophic analyses of these species (Carvalho & Soares, 1997;Sazima, 1998). Consumption of other dietary items from the pelagic layer has also been observed in other studies on the use of habitat by S. setapinnis (Cervigón et al, 1992;Olher & Gasalla, 2023) and O. saliens (Cervigón, 1993;Pichler et al, 2017). In contrast, the third species with a superior opening mouth, C. chrysurus, shows a more generalist diet (including predominance of the generally benthic associated taxa Aluterus monoceros and Porichthys porosissimus) as also observed in other studies (Cervigón, 1966;Cunha et al, 2000;Menezes & Figueiredo, 1980).…”
Section: Re Sults and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, they fed on other carangids and clupeiformes as found in some previous trophic analyses of these species (Carvalho & Soares, 1997;Sazima, 1998). Consumption of other dietary items from the pelagic layer has also been observed in other studies on the use of habitat by S. setapinnis (Cervigón et al, 1992;Olher & Gasalla, 2023) and O. saliens (Cervigón, 1993;Pichler et al, 2017). In contrast, the third species with a superior opening mouth, C. chrysurus, shows a more generalist diet (including predominance of the generally benthic associated taxa Aluterus monoceros and Porichthys porosissimus) as also observed in other studies (Cervigón, 1966;Cunha et al, 2000;Menezes & Figueiredo, 1980).…”
Section: Re Sults and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The failure to identify more benthic-limited and non-fish prey items in the diet may reflect true consumption preferences for fish as prey, or amplification bias, or a lack of identification of invertebrate taxa because of limited reference sequences for the region's fauna. S. setapinnis has recently been described to be piscivorous but with zooplankton complementing the diet while C. chrysurus were found to consume copepods and larval crustaceans including luciferids (Olher & Gasalla, 2023). The luciferid shrimp…”
Section: Re Sults and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%