2016
DOI: 10.1590/2359-3997000000187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of the conicity index with diabetes and hypertension in Brazilian women

Abstract: Objective: The goal of this study was evaluate the conicity index (C index) in women and its association with hypertension (SAH) and diabetes mellitus (DM). Subjects and methods: This was a cross-sectional study, with 573 women between 20 and 59 years of age. After analysis of clinical and demographic characteristics, anthropometric variables were measured and used to calculate the C index. Plasma glucose and lipid profile were evaluated by standard methods. The analysis of the results was based on logistic re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
16
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Conicity index which accounts for WC, weight and height quantify the excess abdominal fat, the increase in values agrees with fat deposition in the central region of the body and has a theoretical range of 1.0 < CI < 1.73. 23 The prevalence of moderate physical activity was only 32.2% in males while 30.3% in females. About 69.7% of the women in the study had inadequate level of physical activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…22 Conicity index which accounts for WC, weight and height quantify the excess abdominal fat, the increase in values agrees with fat deposition in the central region of the body and has a theoretical range of 1.0 < CI < 1.73. 23 The prevalence of moderate physical activity was only 32.2% in males while 30.3% in females. About 69.7% of the women in the study had inadequate level of physical activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…24 Regarding the conicity index, some authors suggest a variation between 1.0 (a perfect cylinder) and 1.73 (a perfect double cone) at the cutoff points; the increase in values agrees with fat deposition in the central region of the body, that is, the closer to 1.73, the greater the central fat deposition. [25][26][27] According to Andrade et al 25 , who studied the conicity index in women and their association with hypertension and diabetes mellitus, women with high conicity index values had 72% and 75% more chances of having diabetes mellitus and hypertension, respectively.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andrade et al 31 observaram o índice C em mulheres e sua associação com hipertensão e diabetes mellitus. Aquelas que apresentavam altos valores de índice C tiveram 72% e 75% mais chance de ter diabetes mellitus e hipertensão, respectivamente.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified