2017
DOI: 10.1590/2358-2936e2017016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allometry and sexual dimorphism of the Neotropical freshwater anomuran Aegla marginata Bond-Buckup & Buckup, 1994 (Crustacea, Anomura, Aeglidae)

Abstract: Th is study analyzes ontogenetic allometry in Aegla marginata Bond-Buckup & Buckup, 1994, a freshwater crustacean, in order to evaluate the growth patt ern and the presence of sexual dimorphism, using a multivariate approach. Th e specimens were sampled from streams in Intervales State Park, São Paulo State, Brazil. For each specimen, we measured the following structures: carapace length and width, chelae height and length, and abdomen length. Allometry was evaluated using Jolicoeur's multivariate allometric c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to test whether dimorphism increases with body size, a canonical discriminant analysis was performed to obtain the scores of individuals of the two sexes in a discriminant axis. Afterwards, following similar works [ 20 ], an ANCOVA based on these scores was used to test the differences between sexes and the interaction with the generalized body size (first PCA axis). Statistical analysis was done with PAST v. 2.17c software [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to test whether dimorphism increases with body size, a canonical discriminant analysis was performed to obtain the scores of individuals of the two sexes in a discriminant axis. Afterwards, following similar works [ 20 ], an ANCOVA based on these scores was used to test the differences between sexes and the interaction with the generalized body size (first PCA axis). Statistical analysis was done with PAST v. 2.17c software [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%