2021
DOI: 10.1590/2318-0331.262120200070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the discretization of river networks for large scale hydrologic-hydrodynamic models

Abstract: The discretization of river networks is a critical step for computing flow routing in hydrological models. However, when it comes to more complex hydrologic-hydrodynamic models, adaptations in the spatial representation of model calculation units are further required to allow cost-effective simulations, especially for large scale applications. The objective of this paper is to assess the impacts of river discretization on simulated discharge, water levels and numerical stability of a catchment-based hydrologic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of the vector‐based river network in this model has several critical advantages to both communities of researchers and users. The actual physical properties of rivers (e.g., river length and slope) can be determined more realistically in the vector river network compared to the grid river network (Fan et al., 2021). In addition, it allows for accurately locating water bodies, such as reservoirs, into the system as compared to the traditional grid‐based river network approach (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of the vector‐based river network in this model has several critical advantages to both communities of researchers and users. The actual physical properties of rivers (e.g., river length and slope) can be determined more realistically in the vector river network compared to the grid river network (Fan et al., 2021). In addition, it allows for accurately locating water bodies, such as reservoirs, into the system as compared to the traditional grid‐based river network approach (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, the adopted value of Δx was 10 km, that is, each segment of river has this length and from this the unitcatchments are delimited in the model. This value was the same successfully used by Fleischmann et al (2018), Lopes et al (2018) and Fan et al (2021).…”
Section: Watershed Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the latest version of the model, the drainage network is extracted from flow directions obtained from a Digital Elevation Model. The network is then segmented into river stretches of fixed length (Δx) for which small unit-catchments are delimited (Fan et al, 2021). Within each of them, Hydrological Response Units (HRUs) are defined based on soil type and land use.…”
Section: The Mgb Hydrological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in addition to the shortcomings in representation of hydrological processes, the model has been calibrated with a limited number of gauge stations by using global precipitation data that is associated with large errors (Beck et al, 2017) and global river geometries that largely affect channel-floodplain water exchanges. Regarding uncertainties in the hydrodynamic modelling processes (e.g., associated with model parameterization or insufficient hydraulic processes representation of flood processes), there are several studies that have addressed this topic in the literature, even for the MGB model (Fan et al, 2021;Fleischmann et al, 2019Fleischmann et al, , 2018Fleischmann et al, , 2020Paiva et al, 2013) Furthermore, A cross-validation between MGB-SA flood extents and several other remote sensing-based datasets has been conducted for the Amazon basin (Fleischmann et al, 2022), albeit a more in-depth validation of simulated flooded areas over other important South American wetlands has not been performed so far. Representing inundation dynamics in the large Pantanal wetland (Paraguay basin) may require more complex flood routing methods than those used in MGB-SA (Bravo et al, 2012;Paz et al, 2011), and therefore we recognize that the contribution of SW on TWS may be underestimated in these areas.…”
Section: Limitations and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%