Proposal of standardization of Horus® computerized posturography in adults

Abstract

Purpose: To propose a normalization model of a posturography platform in adults without changes in body balance, through descriptive analysis by age group and sex. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study. Adults, with no changes in body balance and no vestibular complaints were submitted to 6 sensory conditions on the Horus® posturography platform. The following variables were analyzed: stability limit area and confidence ellipse area, trajectory length and average velocity for each condition tested. The variables were analyzed by age group and sex. The equilibrium score, the sensory integration test and the equilibrium index were calculated on the conditions. Results: Sixty-one subjects (38.3%) and 23 (37.7%) were male, 40 (65.57%) between the ages of 20 and 40 and 21 (34.43). %) between 41 and 59 years. The area of the stability limit and pressure center variables for 6 sensory conditions tested - confidence ellipse area, trajectory length, total mean velocity and confidence ellipse ratio by the area of the stability limit were described. There was a statistically significant difference in the comparison between the area of the stability limit between sexes and between age groups, being a higher value in males and in younger patients. Regarding the analysis of the variables by each condition, there was no difference of results between the sexes and age groups. Conclusion: Subjects of different sexes and age groups should be considered separately only in the analysis of the stability limit.

Avaliação por posturografia de disfunções vestibulares através da estimulação por realidade virtual

“…A posturografia é um exame adicional para diagnóstico de disfunções vestibulares, e é um aliado dos testes tradicionais. Além disso, a posturografia traz resultados quantitativos, e ainda pode identificar a presença de alterações no controle postural, e se estas alterações são decorrentes de uma dificuldade de integração sensorial, à resposta motora ineficaz, ou as duas coisas (Duarte et al, 2022;Ferreira et al, 2020). A avaliação é feita no plano bidimensional e analisa parâmetros como a velocidade e o comprimento de oscilação (Allsopp & Dornhoffer, 2019).…”