Análise acústica do padrão entoacional da fala de indivíduos com Transtorno do Espectro Autista

Olivati, Ana Gabriela; Assumpção, Francisco Baptista; Misquiatti, Andréa Regina Nunes

doi:10.1590/2317-1782/20172016081

Cited by 19 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hubbard and Trauner ( 2007 ) observed the range of vowel intensity (in repetition and spontaneous speech) and found significant variation between participants with and without autism. The same pattern was found for the intensity of elicited utterances (minimum, maximum, and range intensity) by Olivati et al ( 2017 ), whereas no difference on a mean intensity measure was reported by van Santen et al ( 2010 ) using the PEPS-C (Peppé and McCann 2003 ). Likewise, no consensus emerges from studies examining duration or flow rate (a.o.…”

Section: Language Profiles In Asdsupporting

confidence: 78%

“…On the production side, pitch has been widely investigated, but there is no consensus regarding the indices that can effectively characterize the prosody of autistic individuals. Some studies found higher pitch measures than in neurotypical children (Chen et al 2021 ; Olivati et al 2017 ; van Santen et al 2010 ; a.o. ), while others reported results equivalent to those of neurotypical children (Dahlgren et al 2018 ; Diehl and Paul 2013 ; Hubbard and Trauner 2007 ; Paul et al 2008 ; a.o.).…”

Section: Language Profiles In Asdmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Language in autism: domains, profiles and co-occurring conditions

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article reviews the current knowledge state on pragmatic and structural language abilities in autism and their potential relation to extralinguistic abilities and autistic traits. The focus is on questions regarding autism language profiles with varying degrees of (selective) impairment and with respect to potential comorbidity of autism and language impairment: Is language impairment in autism the co-occurrence of two distinct conditions (comorbidity), a consequence of autism itself (no comorbidity), or one possible combination from a series of neurodevelopmental properties (dimensional approach)? As for language profiles in autism, three main groups are identified, namely, (i) verbal autistic individuals without structural language impairment, (ii) verbal autistic individuals with structural language impairment, and (iii) minimally verbal autistic individuals. However, this tripartite distinction hides enormous linguistic heterogeneity. Regarding the nature of language impairment in autism, there is currently no model of how language difficulties may interact with autism characteristics and with various extralinguistic cognitive abilities. Building such a model requires carefully designed explorations that address specific aspects of language and extralinguistic cognition. This should lead to a fundamental increase in our understanding of language impairment in autism, thereby paving the way for a substantial contribution to the question of how to best characterize neurodevelopmental disorders.

show abstract

Section: Language Profiles In Asdsupporting

confidence: 78%

Section: Language Profiles In Asdmentioning

confidence: 97%

Language in autism: domains, profiles and co-occurring conditions

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Test sequences contain 30 speech samples, thus, the total number of speech fragments is 90 (45 fragments for TD and AD children each). The choice of children with ASD and DS is due to the specific features of their speech, which manifest themselves at different levels of organization of speech communication and behavior (Olivati et al, 2017, Bonneh et al, 2011, Kent, Vorperian, 2013Wolk, Brennan, 2016). When listening to audio tests, the subjects filled out specially designed questionnaires.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological Applications and Trends 2022

2022

Psychological Applications and Trends

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) estimated that as of 2021 there were currently 84 million who have been forcibly displaced from their homes across the globe. The conflict in Ukraine has led to a further marked increase in these numbers. Mental health difficulties have been shown to be elevated in forcibly displaced people (including asylum seeking and refugee populations). Risk factors can be associated with events that occurred prior to, during, and after the migratory journey. Whilst there is recognition of the important impact that a history of traumatic events (e.g., torture, abuse and neglect) can have, social adversity in the form of 'daily stressors' (e.g., a lack of access to basic resources, isolation, lack of safety and security, family violence) is being increasingly recognised as an important determinant of the mental health of forcibly displaced people. Concerns have been raised about the potential medicalization of social adversity faced by displaced populations. There has also been a comparative lack of research investigating approaches that may be helpful for enhancing the quality of life and subjective wellbeing of forcibly displaced people. Psychosocial interventions and low-intensity psychological interventions can provide scalable opportunities for treating common mental disorders and promoting wellbeing. This presentation will focus on research studies that I have been involved in which have been undertaken in the EU and in sub-Saharan Africa to evaluate the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for forcibly displaced people. These projects have involved the linguistic and cultural adaptation of interventions and assessment measures. The implications that this research has for the integration of forcibly displaced people in the EU and beyond will be discussed. This will include a focus on conceptual frameworks that provide opportunities for situating determinants of mental health in the socio-political context in which forcibly displaced people live their lives, and not just risk-and protective-factors specific to the individual. BiographyProf. Ross White (PhD, DClinPsy) is a Professor of Clinical Psychology at Queen's University Belfast. He is an expert in Global Mental Health. He was lead editor of 'The Palgrave Handbook of Socio-cultural Perspectives on Global Mental Health'. Ross has research collaborations with the World Health Organization and United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees investigating the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for reducing distress experienced by refugees particularly in the context and/or aftermath of humanitarian crises. He also has an interest in the processes involved in the linguistic/cultural adaptation of psychological therapies. Ross is the Principal Investigator on the ESRC/AHRC funded Community-based Sociotherapy Adapted for Refugees (COSTAR) project that is evaluating a psychosocial intervention for Congolese refugees living in Uganda and Rwanda. Ross was a co-investigator on the EU Horizon2020 funded Refugee Emerg...

show abstract

“…Development, v. 9, n. 11, e92291110437, 2020 (CC BY 4.0) | ISSN 2525-3409 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10437 Durante a terapia, as questões linguísticas são colocadas em prática, surgindo assim, dois fatores que os envolvem, o fator afetivo e a própria linguística. Respectivamente, a primeira, simboliza os aspectos não verbais da linguagem, sendo necessários na transmissão e reconhecimento da expressão, da emoção, como da alegria, raiva, tristeza, entre outras, consequente o segundo fator, simboliza os aspectos verbais, enfatizados pela compressão da leitura, da fala, da escrita (Olivati et al, 2017).…”

Section: Utilização Do Sistema Pecs Como Uma Comunicação Alternativaunclassified

Utilização do sistema de comunicação por troca de imagens para o desenvolvimento comunicativo em Autistas

Silva¹,

Coelho²,

Farias³

2020

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Constitui-se como objetivo principal avaliar a utilização do sistema PEC’S, sendo uma comunicação alternativa, no tratamento de crianças autistas que não verbalizam. Trata-se de pesquisa bibliográfica, explicativa e descritiva. Apresenta-se com caráter subjetivo do objeto analisado, com o intuito de buscar compreender suas particularidades, como forma de entender como é utilizado o sistema PECS, como forma de compreender o repertório lexical de cada indivíduo. O tratamento simboliza uma das formas terapêuticas mais eficaz em autistas que não verbalizam, entretanto, sua duração é indeterminada, podendo haver variações individuais, devido a isso, a forma de tratamento estabelecida nesses casos, deverá ser individualizada e singular. Observou-se que a utilização da PECS, como método terapêutico, favoreceu o tratamento das crianças com TEA, devido ser um promotor de comunicação verbal, em indivíduos que apresentam dificuldades de fala, apesar de ser uma estratégia de ensino individual.

show abstract

Análise acústica do padrão entoacional da fala de indivíduos com Transtorno do Espectro Autista

Cited by 19 publications

References 13 publications

Language in autism: domains, profiles and co-occurring conditions

Language in autism: domains, profiles and co-occurring conditions

Psychological Applications and Trends 2022

Utilização do sistema de comunicação por troca de imagens para o desenvolvimento comunicativo em Autistas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About