2014
DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/201420130077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the force applied by the tongue and lip on the maxillary central incisor tooth

Abstract: At rest, the lip exerts a larger force than the tongue on the maxillary right central incisor tooth. During swallowing, there was no difference between lip and tongue force on the tooth.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
7
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Little information is available about the magnitude of force generally employed by speech‐language pathologists in tongue‐training programmes. The forces used to reach the target in the present study were 1 N and 2 N. These magnitudes are lower than the maximum forces healthy young adults are able to exert (7.5 ± 0.7 N in the up direction and 4.8 ± 0.3 N in lateral directions) but are similar to the magnitudes involved in deglutition (0.02 N‐1.67 N) . There was no difference in the participants’ performance between 1 N and 2 N for any of the dependent variables, which can be possibly explained by the fact that the target force levels used were very low for healthy adults, but it could be high for unhealthy persons.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Little information is available about the magnitude of force generally employed by speech‐language pathologists in tongue‐training programmes. The forces used to reach the target in the present study were 1 N and 2 N. These magnitudes are lower than the maximum forces healthy young adults are able to exert (7.5 ± 0.7 N in the up direction and 4.8 ± 0.3 N in lateral directions) but are similar to the magnitudes involved in deglutition (0.02 N‐1.67 N) . There was no difference in the participants’ performance between 1 N and 2 N for any of the dependent variables, which can be possibly explained by the fact that the target force levels used were very low for healthy adults, but it could be high for unhealthy persons.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…At rest, pressure from the tongue is slight but long lasting and, therefore, can move the teeth. Amanda Valentim, et al in their literature reviewed that atypical swallowing can cause occlusion alterations [23]. It was also hypothesized that duration of tongue is much more important than magnitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outros equipamentos também são utilizados para avaliar a pressão ou força de língua, como o gnatodinamômetro (SILVA et al, 2013, TRAWITZKI et al, 2011a, transdutores de pressão (KENNEDY et al, 2010), sensores de força e pressão (LAMBRECHTS et al, 2010;MCCORMACK et al, 2015;MOTTA et al, 2011;TANIGUSHI et al, 2008;VALENTIM et al, 2014;YANO et al, 2011), Kay Elemetrics (ENGEL-HOEK et al, 2012), Swallow Scan , KayPentax Swallowing Signals Lab (FEI et al, 2012;STEELE et al, 2014;TODD et al, 2013).…”
Section: A Língua E Seu Desempenhounclassified