2017
DOI: 10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trait vs. state anxiety in different threatening situations

Abstract: Objective Anxiety as a uni- or multidimensional construct has been under discussion. The unidimensional approach assumes that there is a general trait anxiety, which predisposes the individuals to increases in state anxiety in various threatening situations. In this case, there should be a correlation between state and trait anxiety in any situation of threat. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between trait and state anxiety in participants exposed to two different anxiogenic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
55
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, participants with normal decision-making may have switched risk-taking and risk-avoidance adaptively under no temporal pressure according to changes in their anxiety profiles in a conflicting situation between the current penalty events and the remote task mission in the course of the IGT under information uncertainty without hints of deck types and an optimal strategy. Although the trait and state anxiety scores of the present participants yielded significant positive correlation ( r = 0.458, p = 0.007), its strength was not prominently high, suggesting that trait and state anxiety possess multidimensionality and may not be strongly correlated because the current situation was not completely compatible with ordinary-life anxious conditions that the participants tend to face (Endler et al, 1991; Leal et al, 2017). Such mild correlation between the two anxiety profiles may in turn leave a margin for partial dissociation between them, consequently yielding a dynamism of global and local decision-making.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…That is, participants with normal decision-making may have switched risk-taking and risk-avoidance adaptively under no temporal pressure according to changes in their anxiety profiles in a conflicting situation between the current penalty events and the remote task mission in the course of the IGT under information uncertainty without hints of deck types and an optimal strategy. Although the trait and state anxiety scores of the present participants yielded significant positive correlation ( r = 0.458, p = 0.007), its strength was not prominently high, suggesting that trait and state anxiety possess multidimensionality and may not be strongly correlated because the current situation was not completely compatible with ordinary-life anxious conditions that the participants tend to face (Endler et al, 1991; Leal et al, 2017). Such mild correlation between the two anxiety profiles may in turn leave a margin for partial dissociation between them, consequently yielding a dynamism of global and local decision-making.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Young (1991) emphasizes that it is not a permanent feature, and it is a reaction that is triggered by the conditions of a particular situation. Empirical research shows that the correlation between trait and state anxiety does exist (Moradi, et al 2015, Leal, et al 2017. Language learning anxiety is somewhat different from other forms of anxiety.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Definitions and Types Of Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STAI measures two aspects of anxiety: state anxiety and trait anxiety. While the former refers to transient anxiety resulting from an adverse event at a certain moment in time, the latter refers to a personal characteristic that describes the relatively stable tendency to perceive an adverse event as dangerous or stressful and to react to such events [40,41]. Given that state anxiety, trait anxiety, and general anxiety are different outcomes, a meta-analysis was conducted for each distinct outcome.…”
Section: Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%