2022
DOI: 10.1590/2179-8966/2022/66662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sistema ou CIS-tema de justiça: Quando a ideia de unicidade dos corpos trans dita as regras para o acesso aos direitos fundamentais

Abstract: Resumo O presente texto discute como o direito de retificar o prenome e gênero nos documentos oficiais, assegurado pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) para as pessoas transexuais e travestis, pode ficar comprometido quando os/as operadores/as do sistema de justiça exigem tecnologias de gênero que agudizam uma passabilidade pautada em performatividades de gênero binárias da/na cisgeneridade.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The described state of invisibility creates an ambiguity in the enforcement of rights for the transgender population (and LGB-TI+ community in general) by the Judiciary, as observed by Mario Gomes, Sara York, and Leandro Colling: "in constitutional actions with erga omnes effectiveness, the Judiciary demonstrates a progressive approach"; however, when handling cases involving the lived experiences of specific groups within this population, "the Judiciary tends to strip away the rights of those who do not conform to a binary and cisnormative gender expression at the individual level". The research demonstrates that the proximity of the member of the justice system to the transgender body is a fact that alters the way he/she interprets and applies rights, and this needs to be taken into account" (GOMES, YORK, COLLING, 2022, p. 1129.…”
Section: Transfeminist Theoretical and Method-ological Remarks 249mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The described state of invisibility creates an ambiguity in the enforcement of rights for the transgender population (and LGB-TI+ community in general) by the Judiciary, as observed by Mario Gomes, Sara York, and Leandro Colling: "in constitutional actions with erga omnes effectiveness, the Judiciary demonstrates a progressive approach"; however, when handling cases involving the lived experiences of specific groups within this population, "the Judiciary tends to strip away the rights of those who do not conform to a binary and cisnormative gender expression at the individual level". The research demonstrates that the proximity of the member of the justice system to the transgender body is a fact that alters the way he/she interprets and applies rights, and this needs to be taken into account" (GOMES, YORK, COLLING, 2022, p. 1129.…”
Section: Transfeminist Theoretical and Method-ological Remarks 249mentioning
confidence: 99%