2018
DOI: 10.1590/2179-8087.015016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the Performance of Ground Filtering Algorithms for Terrain Modeling in a Forest Environment Using Airborne LiDAR Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the above-mentioned methods has been tested in forest areas where the results point to a higher discrepancy among filters as the terrain becomes steep and as the undergrowth increases [17][18][19]. This fact is common in other benchmarks, which shows the higher difference among the filter efficiencies as the terrain complexity increases [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance of the above-mentioned methods has been tested in forest areas where the results point to a higher discrepancy among filters as the terrain becomes steep and as the undergrowth increases [17][18][19]. This fact is common in other benchmarks, which shows the higher difference among the filter efficiencies as the terrain complexity increases [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using and calibrating a filtering algorithm can involve several parameters that may require considerable knowledge from forest practitioners along a tedious and time-consuming process. Many benchmark studies applied parameters calibration to compare filters [18,26], but the practical effects of the calibration on the accuracy of the DTM and the forest attribute estimation are still unknown. This understanding would be valuable for ALS users by supporting them during the data processing to produce the DTM, especially when the forest characterization is the goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some filters are designed to process only the forested areas [3], [29], [30], and others to filter the urban landscapes containing large buildings [2], [31]. Silva et al [32] compared the performance of some airborne LiDAR data filtering algorithms in forested areas. The algorithms are weighted linear least-squares, multiscale curvature classification, progressive morphological filter, and progressive triangulated irregular network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These important applications and many others require the creation of an accurate DTM. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is a well-established active remote sensing technology that can provide accurate digital elevation measurements for the terrain and non-ground objects [1] [2] [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, airborne LiDAR data usually contain measurements for non-ground objects such as ve-F. F. F. Asal DOI: 10.4236/ars.2019.82004 53 Advances in Remote Sensing getation cover, buildings, etc., that need to be efficiently removed for creation of a reliable DTM representing the actual ground surface as if it is a bare earth surface [9]. The Extracted DTMs from airborne LiDAR measurements through stripping off non-ground objects can be employed in many applications such as mapping of the earth's surface and hydrodynamic modeling for flood risk assessments [1]. Thus, since the availability of airborne LiDAR measurements extraction of bare earth DTMs have become attainable with high accuracy through filtering of non-ground point from the high-density airborne LiDAR data termed as point cloud data [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%