2023
DOI: 10.1590/2179-10742021v20i3264599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Dielectric Properties of Graphene and Graphite Using the Resonant Cavity in 5G Test Band

Abstract: This paper presents a study about the dielectric constant r e , dielectric loss tangent tan ( ) g d and effective electrical conductivity e

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the ion size and surface roughness-related effects on electrokinetic flows are outside the scope of our investigations since the focus of our study is on microscale channels of length scales much larger than ion/molecule size. Then, in the continuum approximation, a 0.3 nm (/1.5 nm) thickness for the SLG (/FLG) along with an ε graphene of ∼9 was assumed, with corresponding surface charge densities of 30 and 9 mC/m 2 , respectively. ,, The continuity of the electrical displacement (the product of the dielectric permittivity with the potential gradient) across the electrolyte–graphene interface was taken as a constraint. With the assumed continuity of the electrical displacement and a linear potential profile, the electrical potential at the electrolyte–graphene interface was expressed through the relation: ε e φ false( z false) z | z = 0 = σ s + ε g φ s φ | z = 0 λ G Here, ε e and ε g are the relative permittivity of electrolyte (∼79) and graphene (∼9), respectively, σ s is the total surface charge density on the graphene surface, φ s and φ| z =0 represent the potential of the substrate and potential at the electrolyte–graphene interface, and λ G is the graphene layer thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the ion size and surface roughness-related effects on electrokinetic flows are outside the scope of our investigations since the focus of our study is on microscale channels of length scales much larger than ion/molecule size. Then, in the continuum approximation, a 0.3 nm (/1.5 nm) thickness for the SLG (/FLG) along with an ε graphene of ∼9 was assumed, with corresponding surface charge densities of 30 and 9 mC/m 2 , respectively. ,, The continuity of the electrical displacement (the product of the dielectric permittivity with the potential gradient) across the electrolyte–graphene interface was taken as a constraint. With the assumed continuity of the electrical displacement and a linear potential profile, the electrical potential at the electrolyte–graphene interface was expressed through the relation: ε e φ false( z false) z | z = 0 = σ s + ε g φ s φ | z = 0 λ G Here, ε e and ε g are the relative permittivity of electrolyte (∼79) and graphene (∼9), respectively, σ s is the total surface charge density on the graphene surface, φ s and φ| z =0 represent the potential of the substrate and potential at the electrolyte–graphene interface, and λ G is the graphene layer thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A BZ 4 = 0.46 Å −2 are areas of BZ and truncated BZ in the k • p calculations, 𝜉 = 25 nm is the screening length, and Ω = 21.6 Å 2 is the unit cell area of WTe 2 . The effective dielectric constant ϵ, can be estimated as ϵ = (ϵ 1 + 1)/2 = 5.2, [53] where ϵ 1 = 9.3 for graphene substrate [54,55]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of screened Coulomb interactions in the long wavelength limit U 0 = U ( q ≈ 0) in the 2D heterostructure can be approximated as U0=Akpe2ξ4ABZεε0normalΩ$U_0 = \frac{A_{kp}e^2\xi}{4A_{BZ}\epsilon \epsilon _0\Omega}$, [ 19 ] where ABZ=4π2ab=1.83$A_{BZ}=\frac{4\pi ^2}{ab}=1.83$ Å −2 and Akp=ABZ4=0.46$A_{kp}=\frac{A_{BZ}}{4}=0.46$ Å −2 are areas of BZ and truncated BZ in the k · p calculations, ξ = 25 nm is the screening length, and Ω = 21.6 Å 2 is the unit cell area of WTe 2 . The effective dielectric constant ϵ, can be estimated as ϵ = (ϵ 1 + 1)/2 = 5.2, [ 53 ] where ϵ 1 = 9.3 for graphene substrate [ 54,55 ] and ϵ 2 = 1 for the vacuum above. The above estimate yields U 0 = 25.2 eV in excellent agreement with the U 0 = 25 eV as assumed in this model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphene electron it become a role of zero-bandgap material called Dirac point reason for conduction and valance bond direct connected to each other [4,5,6]. In some previous years, have more expectation in terahertz science and technology, wide band of research areas such a long distance communication, wireless, medical devices, weather predictions and geological sciences etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%