2020
DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.4.23.e1-7.onl
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incisor root length in individuals with and without anterior open bite: a comparative CBCT study

Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to compare the root length of maxillary and mandibular incisors between individuals with open bite versus matched individuals with adequate overbite. Methods: This comparative, matched and retrospective study included 48 cone beam computed tomographies (CBCTs) obtained at a university radiological center. Scans belonged to 24 individuals with open bite (overbite ≤ 0 mm) and 24 individuals with adequate overbite (controls). Both groups were matched by age, sex, malocclusion classifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pervious research reported the root length in individual countries. Root length of anterior dentition in Brazil was 12mm in both maxillary and mandibular central incisors (13). It is reported that for Korean population, root length of maxillary central incisors were 12.3mm for male and 11.75mm for female, and those of maxillary canines were 15.83mm for male and 15.23mm for female (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pervious research reported the root length in individual countries. Root length of anterior dentition in Brazil was 12mm in both maxillary and mandibular central incisors (13). It is reported that for Korean population, root length of maxillary central incisors were 12.3mm for male and 11.75mm for female, and those of maxillary canines were 15.83mm for male and 15.23mm for female (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2 AB). Data showed that buccal-lingual length is shorter than that in mesial-distal view (Table 1), with the subtraction of length higher in incisor groups in the maxilla (p < .0001, 95% CI(mm): 13 Data expressed as mean ± SD / median (percentile). V: valid; WD: wedge defect; BL: buccal-lingual root length; MD: mesial-distal root length; AL: average root length; SL: subtracted root length; 1 a/b : incisor; 2 a/b : lateral incisor; 3 a/b : canine; 1/2/3 a : anterior teeth in the right side; 1/2/3 b : anterior teeth in the left side.…”
Section: Root Lengths Of Maxillary and Mandibular Anterior Teethmentioning
confidence: 99%