2019
DOI: 10.1590/2176-457340996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BAKHTIN, Mikhail. Teoria do romance II: As formas do tempo e do cronotopo. Tradução, posfácio e notas de Paulo Bezerra; organização da edição russa de Serguei Botcharov e Vadim Kójinov. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2018. 272p.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This unfamiliarity, nonetheless, is easily dissipated by the understanding of its meaning, leaving readers and scholars who study Before making some specific remarks about Teoria do romance III [Theory of the Novel III], we need to investigate the macrostructure of the three volumes, which is only possible now that we have this privileged view of all the texts that comprise Bakhtin's theory of the novel. As Silva (2016) and Queijo (2019) emphasized, the volumes enrich the studies of the novel not only because their translation "brings us closer to its author's voice" (SILVA, 2016, p. 269), 14 but because they also provide different paratexts, which includes Bezerra's afterword. For Queijo (2019, p. 164), it "provides a framework for the preceding text."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unfamiliarity, nonetheless, is easily dissipated by the understanding of its meaning, leaving readers and scholars who study Before making some specific remarks about Teoria do romance III [Theory of the Novel III], we need to investigate the macrostructure of the three volumes, which is only possible now that we have this privileged view of all the texts that comprise Bakhtin's theory of the novel. As Silva (2016) and Queijo (2019) emphasized, the volumes enrich the studies of the novel not only because their translation "brings us closer to its author's voice" (SILVA, 2016, p. 269), 14 but because they also provide different paratexts, which includes Bezerra's afterword. For Queijo (2019, p. 164), it "provides a framework for the preceding text."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%