2017
DOI: 10.1590/2175-623670056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Policies in a Globalizing World: methodological reflections

Abstract: -Comparing Policies in a GlobalizingWorld: methodological reflections. This paper explores the methodological challenges in comparing education policies in a globalizing world. It will be developed in the following ways. We begin with sketching out the contours of the changes that have taken place in the governance of education systems as a result of global processes and the challenges to presents us with regarding how we study, and compare, education policies. We do this by way of four 'isms' which we problem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Education research also remained largely focused on national characteristics and developments, with even comparative and international education scholarship prone to assume an analytic stance recently criticized as 'methodological nationalism' (cf. Robertson/Dale 2017). Also, with the educational debates of the past three decades having concentrated on the relevance and implications of coinages like 'globalization' and 'internationalization' processes for national education systems, education research has in turn focused increasingly on the impact of globalization on the national character of education, implying a diminishing importance and/or ability of the state to control and steer education, formerly a state prerogative (Green 1997;Mitter 2006; cf.…”
Section: Education Globalizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education research also remained largely focused on national characteristics and developments, with even comparative and international education scholarship prone to assume an analytic stance recently criticized as 'methodological nationalism' (cf. Robertson/Dale 2017). Also, with the educational debates of the past three decades having concentrated on the relevance and implications of coinages like 'globalization' and 'internationalization' processes for national education systems, education research has in turn focused increasingly on the impact of globalization on the national character of education, implying a diminishing importance and/or ability of the state to control and steer education, formerly a state prerogative (Green 1997;Mitter 2006; cf.…”
Section: Education Globalizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education research also remained largely focused on national characteristics and developments, with even comparative and international education scholarship prone to assume an analytic stance recently criticized as 'methodological nationalism' (cf. Robertson/Dale 2017). Also, with the educational debates of the past three decades having concentrated on the relevance and implications of coinages like 'globalization' and 'internationalization' processes for national education systems, education research has in turn focused increasingly on the impact of globalization on the national character of education, implying a diminishing importance and/or ability of the state to control and steer education, formerly a state prerogative (Green 1997;Mitter 2006; cf.…”
Section: Education Globalizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These developments have had a powerful effect in changing both the pattern and the scale of governance, setting up a globally structured agenda for education (Dale, 2000;2005, pp. 57-59;Robertson & Dale, 2017).…”
Section: Global Trends: Governance Managerialism and Educational Inementioning
confidence: 99%