Governance approach to the prioritization of sustainable development goals in the city of Medellin (Colombia)

Pineda, Abraham Allec Londoño; Cano, José Alejandro; Czerny, Mirosława

doi:10.1590/2175-3369.013.e20200288

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 45 publications

(58 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An alignment of SDGs goals and the renovation programme in Medellin was already undertaken by Pineda and his colleagues [19] through a supported government action toward sustainable development (Governance Approach). In their study, they establish a relation between a life quality survey run by the city with the SDG framework (Technical Approach) using an analytical hierarchy process (AHP).…”

Section: Conclusionesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The interplay between architecture and education = El juego entre la arquitectura y la educación

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Conclusionesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The interplay between architecture and education = El juego entre la arquitectura y la educación

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Navigating sustainability: key factors in prioritising Sustainable Development Goals

Asadikia,

Rajabifard,

Kalantari

2024

Sustain Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prioritising sustainable development goals (SDGs) is one of the fundamental approaches to achieving global sustainability objectives, as it helps efficient resource allocation, addresses urgent needs, enhances policy coherence, and measures impact. Despite existing efforts, there remains an unclear understanding of the key factors needed for effective SDG prioritisation, presenting challenges for strategic planning and decision-making. This study provides an evidence-based analysis of these critical factors by examining relevant literature, conducting surveys, and employing Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). The study identifies four primary factors for SDG prioritisation: SDG interrelations, performance, scope, and alignment. The findings confirm that national prioritisation have more priority compared to global, regional, and sub-national systems, and that prioritisation is more valuable at the indicator level rather than at the goal or target levels. Additionally, prioritisation should initially focus on off-track SDGs. Notably, academia ranks SDG prioritisation based on relationships and performance highly, while government officials emphasise alignment and relevance. Moreover, the results indicate that academia prefers target-level prioritisation, while government officials lean towards indicator level. However, both groups favour national scale over global and regional scales.

show abstract

Assessments under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: A Bibliometric Analysis

Pineda

Cano

2022

Environmental and Climate Technologies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The United Nations announced its 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development worldwide in 2015. Comprehensive assessments of member states’ performance towards achieving the related UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have since become a major challenge for national and subnational governments. This article presents a bibliometric analysis on the assessment of SDGs, at both the general and specific levels, based on 418 publications obtained from Scopus. The general level of analysis includes the number, types, and subject areas of documents published each year, as well as considerations such as the most-cited publications and the leading authors, journals, countries, institutional affiliations, and funders. The specific level of analysis includes a study of the relevant concepts in the publications and their relationships, allowing for the identification of predominant assessments under the 2030 Agenda, and of the most-often evaluated SDGs. Results indicated a focus on measuring impacts and risks, with SDGs 3, 6, 13, 7, 8, and 4 having been assessed the most often among the 17 SDGs, which is consistent with findings in prevalent subject areas such as environmental sciences, social sciences, medicine, and energy. Future works should address assessments under the 2030 Agenda more comprehensively, including analyses on trade-offs among the SDGs and on the transversal nature of some of these goals.

show abstract

Governance approach to the prioritization of sustainable development goals in the city of Medellin (Colombia)

Cited by 3 publications

References 45 publications

The interplay between architecture and education = El juego entre la arquitectura y la educación

The interplay between architecture and education = El juego entre la arquitectura y la educación

Navigating sustainability: key factors in prioritising Sustainable Development Goals

Assessments under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: A Bibliometric Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About