2019
DOI: 10.1590/1984-70332019v19n4a61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic variation and heritability of heading date in hexaploid oat

Abstract: The onset of flowering is decisive to the reproductive success of plants. The objectives of this study were to characterize the phenotypic variation in heading date and estimate its heritability in segregating populations of oat (Avena sativa L.). F 2 and F 3 generations of two large populations, derived from crosses 'URS Taura × Leggett' and 'FL0206B-S-B-S1 × UFRGS 078030-1', were evaluated. A wide phenotypic variation in the number of days to heading was observed in both populations. Heritability coefficient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A review conducted by Sorrells and Simmons (1992) of North American cultivated oat cultivars showed that flowering was normal with photoperiods of >11 h for cultivars with different levels of photoperiod sensitivity. Additionally, with between 18 and 24 h of light, the length of the cycle is more affected by the temperature than the photoperiod duration (Bleken & Skjelvåg, 1986; Wiggans & Frey, 1955), indicating a close relationship between temperature and photoperiod in plant growth and development (Bleken & Skjelvåg, 1986; Garner & Allard, 1920; Mazurkievicz, Ubert, Krause, & Nava, 2019). A wide range of variation in flowering date has been reported in oat, with most of the early‐maturing cultivars being insensitive to temperature and photoperiod, whereas late‐maturing cultivars were sensitive to temperature and photoperiod (Koshkin, Loskutov, Smirnova, & Matvienko, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review conducted by Sorrells and Simmons (1992) of North American cultivated oat cultivars showed that flowering was normal with photoperiods of >11 h for cultivars with different levels of photoperiod sensitivity. Additionally, with between 18 and 24 h of light, the length of the cycle is more affected by the temperature than the photoperiod duration (Bleken & Skjelvåg, 1986; Wiggans & Frey, 1955), indicating a close relationship between temperature and photoperiod in plant growth and development (Bleken & Skjelvåg, 1986; Garner & Allard, 1920; Mazurkievicz, Ubert, Krause, & Nava, 2019). A wide range of variation in flowering date has been reported in oat, with most of the early‐maturing cultivars being insensitive to temperature and photoperiod, whereas late‐maturing cultivars were sensitive to temperature and photoperiod (Koshkin, Loskutov, Smirnova, & Matvienko, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying two hulled by naked oat mapping populations, Zimmer et al (2018) observed a phenotypic variation ranging from 70 to 103 days to heading date between recombinant inbred lines, varying according with planting date and mapping population. Characterizing heading date of 563 F 2 individuals from a southern-by-spring oat population, Mazurkievicz et al (2019) identified a phenotypic variation ranging from 79 to 132 days. In this sense, the wider phenotypic variation of the UFRGS Oat Panel, associated to a large set of markers, detected important genomic regions associated to heading date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heritability and phenotypic variance along with the selection intensity can give the most accurate estimate of genetic advance for effective selection (Parvin et al, 2020). High heritability along with high genetic advance for a particular trait indicated most effective selection condition (Bibi et al, 2016;Rahim, 2018 andMazurkievicz et al, 2019). For developing a high yielding variety, it is very important to estimate the individual role of different morphological traits on higher yield (Ejaz-Ul-Hasan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%