2016
DOI: 10.1590/1984-70332016v16n4a44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tomato second cycle hybrids as a source of genetic variability for fruit quality traits

Abstract: The objective of this study was to investigate the phenotypic and molecular variability in a F

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However and in contrast with the expected under selfing, i.e., a broadening in phenotypic variability due to an increment in homozygosity, the variance for all traits was greater in F 2 than in F 3 , except for shelf life. In previous studies (Cabodevila et al 2017a;Pereira da Costa et al 2016), this relationship between SCH and their segregating generations was verified. In general, average and variability are greater in parents than in progenies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…However and in contrast with the expected under selfing, i.e., a broadening in phenotypic variability due to an increment in homozygosity, the variance for all traits was greater in F 2 than in F 3 , except for shelf life. In previous studies (Cabodevila et al 2017a;Pereira da Costa et al 2016), this relationship between SCH and their segregating generations was verified. In general, average and variability are greater in parents than in progenies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…A double-cross is generated from a two-stage crossing involving two pairs of inbreeds. Plants from a double-cross hybrid are not genetically uniform (heterozygous) (Pereira da Costa et al 2016). Evaluation and selection are required to achieve high homozygosity with superior traits (Chung and Liao 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By crossing selected RILs, second-cycle hybrids (SCH) are obtained (Ipsilandis et al, 2006;Pereira da Costa et al, 2016). Cabodevila et al (2017a) evaluated a F 2 population of 69 individuals that was generated by selfing the SCH (F 1 ToUNR18 x ToUNR1) obtained by Marchionni Basté et al (2010) when crossing some of the previously mentioned tomato RILs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%