2016
DOI: 10.1590/1984-70332016v16n2a18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimate of genetic parameters in Brachiaria decumbens hybrids

Abstract: weight (FGW); total dry matter (TDM); speed of regrowth (SR); tiller regrowth density (TRD); regrowth ability (REG); crude protein (CP); in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVD); neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and lignin (LIG). The statistical analyses were carried out using the mixed models methods. Genetic variability for all traits assessed was detected, and estimates of individual heritability were of medium to high magnitude, indicating the possibility of gains with selection. Significant genetic correl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(18 reference statements)
5
20
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, FGW and TDM exhibited a negative correlation with CP and IVD, thus the higher the weight of a plant, the higher its fiber and lignin content and lower its protein. These observations contrast with those for U. humidicola (Figueiredo et al, 2012) and U. decumbens (Matias et al, 2016), where a high negative correlation between CP and FGW jeopardized the selection of one in favor of the other. These results were unlike those observed in U. decumbens (Matias et al, 2016) and U. ruziziensis (Simeão et al, 2016a), in which the increase in weight and regrowth promotes an increase in fiber and lignin for dealing with structural components of the cell wall (Van Soest, 1995;Mauri et al, 2015).…”
Section: Traits Correlationscontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, FGW and TDM exhibited a negative correlation with CP and IVD, thus the higher the weight of a plant, the higher its fiber and lignin content and lower its protein. These observations contrast with those for U. humidicola (Figueiredo et al, 2012) and U. decumbens (Matias et al, 2016), where a high negative correlation between CP and FGW jeopardized the selection of one in favor of the other. These results were unlike those observed in U. decumbens (Matias et al, 2016) and U. ruziziensis (Simeão et al, 2016a), in which the increase in weight and regrowth promotes an increase in fiber and lignin for dealing with structural components of the cell wall (Van Soest, 1995;Mauri et al, 2015).…”
Section: Traits Correlationscontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…These results were unlike those observed in U. decumbens (Matias et al, 2016) and U. ruziziensis (Simeão et al, 2016a), in which the increase in weight and regrowth promotes an increase in fiber and lignin for dealing with structural components of the cell wall (Van Soest, 1995;Mauri et al, 2015). On the other hand, FGW and TDM exhibited a negative correlation with CP and IVD, thus the higher the weight of a plant, the higher its fiber and lignin content and lower its protein.…”
Section: Traits Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation between agronomical and nutritional traits follows what has been observed previously for the genus Urochloa, as described for U. humidicola (Rendle) Morrone & Zuloaga (de Figueiredo et al, 2012), U. decumbens (Matias et al, 2016), U. ruziziensis (Simeão et al, 2016) and U. brizantha (Mauri et al, 2015). For forage growth, a considerable content of lignin and fiber is needed for the structural development and thickening of the cell wall, but this is an undesirable trait, as it decreases digestibility.…”
Section: Variability Of Forage Traits During the Dry And Wet Seasonssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Different markers were identified for the same trait in different environmental conditions (annual, dry, and wet season), which corroborates that forage yield is associated with the hybrid's performance under abiotic and biotic stresses (Pabón et al, 2007;Mendonça et al, 2013;Matias et al, 2016). Furthermore, it may indicate a pleiotropic action among many forage traits.…”
Section: Importance Of the Annotated Genes For Forage Yieldsupporting
confidence: 66%