2017
DOI: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;2;00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validade De Testes De Campo Para Estimativa Da Aptidão Cardiorrespiratória Em Crianças E Adolescentes: Uma Revisão Sistemática

Abstract: Objective: To systematically review the literature to verify the validity of field-tests to evaluate cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in children and adolescents. Data sources: The electronic search was conducted in the databases: Medline (PubMed), SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, in addition to the Latin American databases LILACS and SciELO. The search comprised the period from the inception of each database until February 2015, in English and Portuguese. All stages of the process were performed in accorda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(191 reference statements)
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a uniform measure of CRF is strongly recommended. The most feasible method to express CRF seems to be as V O 2max per kg of body mass [ 90 ], since most CRF field-test results can be satisfactorily expressed as V O 2max [ 91 , 92 ]. Thus, reporting CRF in both absolute values and V O 2max per kg of body mass would aid comparisons between studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a uniform measure of CRF is strongly recommended. The most feasible method to express CRF seems to be as V O 2max per kg of body mass [ 90 ], since most CRF field-test results can be satisfactorily expressed as V O 2max [ 91 , 92 ]. Thus, reporting CRF in both absolute values and V O 2max per kg of body mass would aid comparisons between studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were running between two lines separated by 20 m continuously at an incremental pace, dictated by an audio signal, till exhaustion. This test differs from 20 m shuttle run test (Batista et al, 2017 ) as it includes a 10 s recovery after the completion of each 40 m.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerobic capacity. Aerobic capacity was evaluated by the Léger test [29], which has confirmed validity and reliability in children [30][31][32]. The test involved running continuously between two points that were 20 metres apart.…”
Section: Physical Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%