2018
DOI: 10.1590/1983-80422018262245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resultados negativos na pesquisa científica: aspectos éticos

Abstract: Resumo Resultados nulos, negativos ou inesperados são ocorrências possíveis para pesquisadores em todo o mundo. Não publicar tais resultados representa desperdício de recursos (de tempo, dinheiro e esforços). O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar, mediante aplicação de questionário, o que estudantes de medicina e médicos pensam sobre a publicação de resultados inesperados ou negativos em pesquisa e discutir os aspectos éticos da questão. As questões foram respondidas por 40 alunos e 30 médicos de uma faculdade p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the scarcity of journals, the literature reports other reasons that lead investigators to neglect research results that are considered negative. Based on the analysis of the authors who dealt with the subject, the main reasons that lead researchers not to publish the negative results of their research were identified and systematized in Chart 2 (Fanelli, 2012;Matosin et al, 2014;Hendrix, [2016]; Guimarães et al, 2018). They cover a wide spectrum that begins with the actual idealization of science and its relationship with the valorization of finished scientific endeavors; they go through the researchers' individual beliefs, attitudes and cognitive processes that reject their negative results; they involve the professional and academic impact of publishing negative results; the organizational and funding barriers that disqualify these results; the rigorous review of research flows and methodologies that have produced negative results and the more in-depth peer review; and, finally, the precariousness of the editorial infrastructures geared to negative results.…”
Section: Publication Of Negative Results: Revealing the Dark Matter Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the scarcity of journals, the literature reports other reasons that lead investigators to neglect research results that are considered negative. Based on the analysis of the authors who dealt with the subject, the main reasons that lead researchers not to publish the negative results of their research were identified and systematized in Chart 2 (Fanelli, 2012;Matosin et al, 2014;Hendrix, [2016]; Guimarães et al, 2018). They cover a wide spectrum that begins with the actual idealization of science and its relationship with the valorization of finished scientific endeavors; they go through the researchers' individual beliefs, attitudes and cognitive processes that reject their negative results; they involve the professional and academic impact of publishing negative results; the organizational and funding barriers that disqualify these results; the rigorous review of research flows and methodologies that have produced negative results and the more in-depth peer review; and, finally, the precariousness of the editorial infrastructures geared to negative results.…”
Section: Publication Of Negative Results: Revealing the Dark Matter Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detecção de achados benignos, neste estudo, remete à importância de divulgação para a comunidade científica, pois essa observação poderá direcionar novas pesquisas, conduzindo para ampliação de discussões sobre o tema e para o reconhecimento dos benefícios de saúde no ambiente carcerário, pois a promoção e a prevenção de agravos são extremamente relevantes nessa população, além da economia de tempo e recursos (GUIMARÃES et al, 2018). Ademais, é importante refletir que, mesmo que a unidade prisional não possua o número mínimo de recuperandas para a implementação de uma equipe de saúde, estratégias preventivas devem ser criadas, sejam através de redes entre serviços de saúde, como também, quando possível, com as instituições de ensino.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The voluntary participant was free to refuse to participate or withdraw their consent, at any stage of the study, without any penalty and without prejudice to their care. Confidentiality was guaranteed to him, ensuring privacy regarding the confidential data involved in this study (GAIVA, 2009). To substantiate the consent of the research participants, they were asked to sign a Terms of Free and Informed Consent (TCLE) [8], prepared by the responsible researcher, authorizing their participation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%