2014
DOI: 10.1590/1983-80422014223029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O placebo e a Declaração de Pachuca: letras mortas?

Abstract: ResumoA Confederação Médica Latino-Americana e do Caribe, organização que congrega as entidades congêneres dos países da região, atua em defesa da profissão médica e da saúde da população, guiando-se por documentos internacionais. Em sua Assembleia Geral (Pachuca, México; foi aprovada a Declaração de Pachuca, com severas críticas à revisão da Declaração de Helsinki ocorrida no Brasil e aos ensaios clínicos que usam placebo em doenças com tratamento definido. O tom duro e enérgico dessa Declaração propõe que en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absorption by the CME of the normative content of CFM resolution n o 1885/2008 was the consolidation of a position contrary to the Declaration of Helsinki developed by the World Medical Association regarding the use of placebo in scientific experiments if there is any effective treatment to be compared with the new drug that is being tested. 26,27 Finally, we need to reflect on what the similarity tree shows. There seems to be two opposite poles in the CME discourse: On one side stands the physician and, on the other, the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorption by the CME of the normative content of CFM resolution n o 1885/2008 was the consolidation of a position contrary to the Declaration of Helsinki developed by the World Medical Association regarding the use of placebo in scientific experiments if there is any effective treatment to be compared with the new drug that is being tested. 26,27 Finally, we need to reflect on what the similarity tree shows. There seems to be two opposite poles in the CME discourse: On one side stands the physician and, on the other, the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%