2022
DOI: 10.1590/1982-4327e3229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Accessed Content Matter? Social Media and Body (Dis)satisfaction: A Moderation Analysis

Abstract: The type of content accessed on social networks may negatively affect body image. The objective of the study is to identify in the relationship between the frequency of use of social networks (Freq. SM) and body (dis)satisfaction, the moderating role of following physical appearance focused pages (FON) and to identify differences in the levels of body (dis)satisfaction between those who follow or not these pages. 499 women (71.1%) and 203 men (28.9%) adults participated. All answered a sociodemographic questio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this model, where the moderation effect of strategic agility is seen when the R 2 value is examined, it is determined that competitive advantage is explained by 65.8%. The relevance of the moderation effect is evaluated by examining the 𝑓 2 values of 0.005, 0.010, and 0.025, which indicate small, medium, and large effects, respectively, as suggested by Kenny (2018) and Hair et al (2021), and it is seen that the results of the moderation effect of strategic agility on the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage indicated a large effect (𝑓 2 = 0.080). In addition, the predictive power of the model is found to be greater than zero (𝑄 predict 2 =0.534) and high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, where the moderation effect of strategic agility is seen when the R 2 value is examined, it is determined that competitive advantage is explained by 65.8%. The relevance of the moderation effect is evaluated by examining the 𝑓 2 values of 0.005, 0.010, and 0.025, which indicate small, medium, and large effects, respectively, as suggested by Kenny (2018) and Hair et al (2021), and it is seen that the results of the moderation effect of strategic agility on the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage indicated a large effect (𝑓 2 = 0.080). In addition, the predictive power of the model is found to be greater than zero (𝑄 predict 2 =0.534) and high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%