2018
DOI: 10.1590/1982-4327e2838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Chemistry Based on the Stimulus Equivalence Model

Abstract: This study aimed to verify the effects of a procedure, based on the stimulus equivalence model, to teach naming 10 chemical elements, from their symbolic representations and their respective numbers and atomic models. Eight high school students participated. Four classes of stimuli were used: (A) name; (B) symbol; (C) atomic number; (E) atomic model of chemical elements. The following were performed: evaluation of the initial repertoire; teaching of conditional relations and testing of emergence of new conditi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of the present experiment was not to compare different methods for promoting knowledge about nutrition but rather to show how procedures based on stimulus-equivalence technology can be used to foster learning abilities within a specific context (e.g., de Abreu César & Moroz, 2018;Walker & Rehfeldt, 2012). The reason for using such technology is based on a substantial amount of research showing that training a few relations, will produce a larger number of relations that are not directly trained.…”
Section: General Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the present experiment was not to compare different methods for promoting knowledge about nutrition but rather to show how procedures based on stimulus-equivalence technology can be used to foster learning abilities within a specific context (e.g., de Abreu César & Moroz, 2018;Walker & Rehfeldt, 2012). The reason for using such technology is based on a substantial amount of research showing that training a few relations, will produce a larger number of relations that are not directly trained.…”
Section: General Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%