2019
DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20180032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between fish and otolith dimensions of Pomatomus saltatrix (Linnaeus, 1766) (Perciformes: Pomatomidae) in southeastern Brazil

Abstract: The bluefish, Pomatomus saltatrix (Linnaeus, 1766), was used as a species-specific model to study morphometric relationships between otolith size and relative growth variables. Length-weight relationships between Otolith (Length-OL, Height-OH, and Weight-OW) and fish measurements (Total Length-TL and Total Weight-TW) were determined for fishes captured monthly during the year 2015 off the southeastern coast of Brazil. The ANCOVA and Kruskal-Wallis analysis did not indicate significant differences in the relati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These correlations found in this study were expected, as similar records for otolith dimensions and somatic growth have been documented for different species groups and fish stocks (e.g. Battaglia et al, 2010;Munk, 2012;Souza et al, 2019). Some studies observed that fish growth rate can influence otolith size, reinforcing the link between fish size and otolith size (Huuskonen and Karjalainen, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These correlations found in this study were expected, as similar records for otolith dimensions and somatic growth have been documented for different species groups and fish stocks (e.g. Battaglia et al, 2010;Munk, 2012;Souza et al, 2019). Some studies observed that fish growth rate can influence otolith size, reinforcing the link between fish size and otolith size (Huuskonen and Karjalainen, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The shape and size of the otoliths represent a pattern among bony fish families, usually species-specific (Harvey, 2000;Tuset et al, 2008). Studies demonstrating a positive correlation between otolith length and fish length and weight are common (Battaglia et al, 2010;Souza et al, 2019;Chanthran et al, 2020). Variations may occur between species and individuals, due to physiological or exogenous factors (Volpedo and Echeverría, 1999;Lombarte et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the otolith−fish size relationship for juveniles of four species of Scianidae in the De la Plata River estuary, in southern Uruguay (Waessle et al 2003), included three of our species (M. ancylodon, M. furnieri, and P. brasiliensis), which showed similar parameter values to those estimated in our study. Assis et al (2018) analyzed seven species of commercial importance from the coast of Bahia, in northeastern Brazil, and Souza et al (2019) studied Pomatomus saltatrix from the coast of Rio de Janeiro in the southeast. Besides their economic importance, some of these fish species, such as M. ancylodon, M. americanus, M. furnieri, P. harrowerri, and T. lepturus, are common prey of the estuarine dolphin, Sotalia guianensis (Van Bénéden, 1864), that occurs along the Brazilian coast (Vieira 2014), further highlighting the importance of our biometric estimators for ecological studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on otoliths in marine fish from the Western South Atlantic are scarce (Waessle et al 2003;Assis et al VOL. 49(4) 2019: 299 -306 ACTA AMAZONICA 2018; Souza et al 2019). The high nutrient and sediment load from the Amazon River, near the Northern Coast of Brazil favors the occurrence of abundant fishery stocks, mainly shrimp (Penaeidae) and several fish species (Isaac and Braga 1999;Marceniuk et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otolith morphology varies between species, however separate stocks of the same species, often identical physically can sometimes be discriminated through subtle differences in otolith morphometrics (Tuset et al, 2003;Zengin et al, 2015;Ibáñez et al, 2017;Mapp et al, 2017). When the relationship between otolith dimensions and total length in a species is determined, the total length or standard length of a fish from its otolith dimensions can be estimated, or vice versa (Şen et al, 2001;Battaglia et al, 2010;Başusta et al, 2013;Yilmaz et al, 2014;Saygın et al, 2017;Yazicioğlu et al, 2017;Zengin et al, 2017;Ozpicak et al, 2018;Souza et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%