2017
DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20160141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using ancient DNA to unravel taxonomic puzzles: the identity of Deuterodon pedri (Ostariophysi: Characidae)

Abstract: Accurate identification is essential for any study exploring biodiversity. Unfortunately, museum type specimens preserved for more than a hundred years are often not informative enough for precise identification of the species represented by the name-bearing type. The use of ancient DNA can help solve taxonomic problems when name-bearing types no longer have diagnostic morphological features that allow for an accurate identification of the species involved. That is the case for Deuterodon pedri, an endemic spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The recognition that hDNA allows for sampling extinct species (e.g., [24][25][26][27]) and extirpated populations (e.g., [28]), as well as improving taxonomic coverage (e.g., [29]), has been borne out in new work (Table 2). Recent hDNA studies have helped to discover and delimit species (e.g., [27,30]), resolve phylogenetic relationships and investigate convergent evolution [31], infer biogeographic history [7], document genetic erosion in populations [9,32], clarify taxonomic confusion with type specimens [33][34][35][36], and investigate epigenetic effects such as cytosine methylation [37]. Historical specimens have also been used to pinpoint the biogeographic origins of domesticated crops, which often have highly complex anthropogenic histories.…”
Section: Box 1 Consistent Naming Of Dna Sources Ancient Versus Historical Versus Modern Versus Archival Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition that hDNA allows for sampling extinct species (e.g., [24][25][26][27]) and extirpated populations (e.g., [28]), as well as improving taxonomic coverage (e.g., [29]), has been borne out in new work (Table 2). Recent hDNA studies have helped to discover and delimit species (e.g., [27,30]), resolve phylogenetic relationships and investigate convergent evolution [31], infer biogeographic history [7], document genetic erosion in populations [9,32], clarify taxonomic confusion with type specimens [33][34][35][36], and investigate epigenetic effects such as cytosine methylation [37]. Historical specimens have also been used to pinpoint the biogeographic origins of domesticated crops, which often have highly complex anthropogenic histories.…”
Section: Box 1 Consistent Naming Of Dna Sources Ancient Versus Historical Versus Modern Versus Archival Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, genetic data from museum specimens has been used to track temporal and spatial changes in species distributions (Lozier & Cameron 2009), investigate population genetics (Spurgin et al 2014;Schmid et al 2018), and evaluate conservation implications (Anco et al 2018;Brandt et al 2018). Additionally, accessing molecular sequence data from natural history collections may be an invaluable resource for resolving taxonomic questions (Cappellini et al 2014), including generating genetic data from type specimens (Hawksworth 2013;Silva et al 2017;McGuire et al 2018). Furthermore, DNA from historical museum specimens can provide novel insights into ambiguously identified collections (Chambers & Hebert 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In taxonomy, the use of aDNA has been a powerful tool for solving problems wherein the type specimens, usually very old, no longer preserve diagnostic features for species identification [3,4]. However, the DNA extracted from this kind of sample is usually little and highly fragmented, restricting the success of further applications.…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%