2016
DOI: 10.1590/1981-863720160003000043027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro evaluation of gingival fibroblasts proliferation and smear layer formation in pre-conditioned root surfaces

Abstract: In vitro evaluation of gingival fibroblasts proliferation and smear layer formation in pre-conditioned root surfaces ABSTRACT ObjectiveThe objective of the present study was to evaluate, in vitro, fibroblastic proliferation on chemically conditioned root surfaces. Methods Forty single-rooted human teeth, were cut into fragments and divided into four groups (n=20): GI (control) -scaling and root planing (SRP); GII -SRP + conditioning with 10% citric acid; GIII -SRP + conditioning with 24% EDTA gel and GIV -SRP … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the current study showed that the cell viability of the fibroblasts attached to roots treated with scaling only was the highest compared with all other groups, and that scaled teeth treated with EDTA or CHX did not enhance cell attachment. This is in agreement with other studies which demonstrated that SRP is the standard requirement for attachment of fibroblasts and that root treatment with EDTA did not enhance cell viability or attachment over SRP alone when measured using either stereomicroscope or scanning electron microscope ( Girotra and Vandana, 2014 , Lima et al, 2016 ). Additionally, other researchers stated that the exposure of fibroblasts to ≥0.02% CHX reduced the survival rate of the cells in vitro ( Liu et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of the current study showed that the cell viability of the fibroblasts attached to roots treated with scaling only was the highest compared with all other groups, and that scaled teeth treated with EDTA or CHX did not enhance cell attachment. This is in agreement with other studies which demonstrated that SRP is the standard requirement for attachment of fibroblasts and that root treatment with EDTA did not enhance cell viability or attachment over SRP alone when measured using either stereomicroscope or scanning electron microscope ( Girotra and Vandana, 2014 , Lima et al, 2016 ). Additionally, other researchers stated that the exposure of fibroblasts to ≥0.02% CHX reduced the survival rate of the cells in vitro ( Liu et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To the authors’ best knowledge, the effect of antiseptics or antibiotics commonly used in local delivery of a therapeutic agent in the management of peri-implant infections on the migration ability of HGF on zirconia surfaces remains unexplored. However, as noted previously, cellular proliferation was negatively affected as a result of the cytotoxic nature of other common antiseptics, thus implying the inability of cells to migrate in the presence of these antiseptics [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 29 ]. The current study was able to demonstrate an overall positive effect of bergenin on migration in the context of zirconia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The resazaurin assay for cellular proliferation revealed that bergenin also did not have a significant effect on the rate of cellular proliferation. To date, there is no literature that explores the effect of antiseptics and antibiotics on HGF proliferation in the context of zirconia surfaces; however, several studies demonstrate the negative impact of commonly used oral antiseptics (i.e., CHX, Povidone-Iodine and Hydrogen peroxide) on cellular proliferation and the negative impact of antibiotics that are commonly prescribed for the management of peri-implant infections [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. Emmadi et al (2008) noted the dose-dependent effect of oral antiseptics, with CHX (0.2%) being more cytotoxic than Povidone-Iodine (1%) [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation