2015
DOI: 10.1590/1981-863720150003000082908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different post-cure polymerization treatment on composite resin hardness

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the influence of different additional polymerization methods on the microhardness of two direct composite resins. Methods Direct Composite resins samples (Fill Magic and Opallis) and a Laboratory RESUMOObjetivo Avaliar a influência de diferentes métodos de polimerização complementar na microdureza de duas resinas compostas de uso direto. MétodosAs amostras foram confeccionadas com as resinas FillMagic, Opallis e Ceramage (Resina Composta Laboratorial); e fotopolimerizadas conforme recomen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A busca por restaurações estéticas fez com que houvesse uma evolução nos materiais restauradores, surgindo assim as resinas à base de monômeros, como Bis-EMA, TEGDMA e UDMA 8,12,13 . A incorporação desses monômeros à formulação das resinas à base de Bis-GMA resulta em um aumento da resistência à flexão 12 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A busca por restaurações estéticas fez com que houvesse uma evolução nos materiais restauradores, surgindo assim as resinas à base de monômeros, como Bis-EMA, TEGDMA e UDMA 8,12,13 . A incorporação desses monômeros à formulação das resinas à base de Bis-GMA resulta em um aumento da resistência à flexão 12 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…At present, the demand for orthopedic treatment with fixed prostheses is increasing [1,2], taking place in the conditions of a consistently high level of aesthetic requirements of patients [3,4]. When choosing facing materials applied to the frameworks of fixed prostheses, their distinctive features and competitive advantages are assessed, including the economic benefits of the application, aesthetic qualities, physical and mechanical characteristics [5]. The last, in the indicated list, is the most significant, as the violation of the integrity of the prosthesis leads to its unconditional alteration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%