2014
DOI: 10.1590/1981-8637201400030000012170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method of comparing the wear resistance of various materials used for artificial teeth

Abstract: Objective Results The nonparametric Kruskal Wallis test showed no statistically significant difference between the medians of brands evaluated in the cycles performed (p = 0.936). Conclusion RESUMO ObjetivoAvaliar a resistência ao desgaste por abrasão de três marcas comerciais de dentes artificiais de resina acrílica disponíveis no mercado nacional (Biotone ® , Vipi Dent Plus ® e Artiplus ® ) por meio de uma nova metodologia. MétodosOs corpos de prova foram produzidos pelos fabricantes, com resina incisal em f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wear testing procedure was performed for each specimen under the applied load of 5 N, and the number of cycles that each specimen was subjected to was 2,000. 24 The time each specimen was held stationary in the apparatus with the help of screws was 142 s. Continuous rinsing with demineralized water (73°C) was used during the wear test so that the abraded particles could be removed from the sample surface and the wet environment of the oral cavity could be simulated. 25 After completing the wear test, the specimen was removed from the testing device, cleaned of all debris and left to dry.…”
Section: Abrasive Wear Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wear testing procedure was performed for each specimen under the applied load of 5 N, and the number of cycles that each specimen was subjected to was 2,000. 24 The time each specimen was held stationary in the apparatus with the help of screws was 142 s. Continuous rinsing with demineralized water (73°C) was used during the wear test so that the abraded particles could be removed from the sample surface and the wet environment of the oral cavity could be simulated. 25 After completing the wear test, the specimen was removed from the testing device, cleaned of all debris and left to dry.…”
Section: Abrasive Wear Testmentioning
confidence: 99%