2014
DOI: 10.1590/1981-8637201400010000082382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of 17% EDTA on removal of canal wall smear layer and calcium hydroxide dressing: part II

Abstract: Objective the aim of this study was to evaluate, by scanning electron microscopy, the effectiveness of 17% EDTA on removal of canal wall smear layer and calcium hydroxide dressing in different thirds of root canal. MethodsTtwenty-four premolars were instrumented in the cervical and middle thirds using Gates-Glidden drills. At the working length, the canal was widened up to # 35 file, followed by scaling up to file # 50. After instrumentation, the teeth were divided into four groups according to the treatment r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be explained as being due to the irrigation system having attained the apical third less efficiently, as a result of the size of the aspiration needle and needle tip not reaching the complete extension of the working length of the root canal, thus not allowing the irrigant solutions to achieve the desired result. [ 20 ] These limitations have also been pointed out by Pereira. [ 21 ] In the apical thirds of the specimen, the groups with MES showed the presence of loose, scattered clusters of debris whereas the groups without MES showed the presence of debris that adhered to the dentinal walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This may be explained as being due to the irrigation system having attained the apical third less efficiently, as a result of the size of the aspiration needle and needle tip not reaching the complete extension of the working length of the root canal, thus not allowing the irrigant solutions to achieve the desired result. [ 20 ] These limitations have also been pointed out by Pereira. [ 21 ] In the apical thirds of the specimen, the groups with MES showed the presence of loose, scattered clusters of debris whereas the groups without MES showed the presence of debris that adhered to the dentinal walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%