2014
DOI: 10.1590/1981-38212014000100005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical theory and social justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growing inequalities affecting humanity and the urgent search for answers to the global problems affecting our communities require a search for new frameworks (Wolff et al, 2016). This need is reflected in theories and models of health equity (Braveman et al, 2011), critical theory (De Vita, 2014), critical race theory (Delgado & Stefancic, 2000), structural racism (Wolff et al, 2016), feminist theory (Riger, 2017), civil rights (Jenkins & Morris, 1984), disability rights (Charlton, 2000), LGBTQ rights (Samuels et al, 2019), and reproductive justice (Ross, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing inequalities affecting humanity and the urgent search for answers to the global problems affecting our communities require a search for new frameworks (Wolff et al, 2016). This need is reflected in theories and models of health equity (Braveman et al, 2011), critical theory (De Vita, 2014), critical race theory (Delgado & Stefancic, 2000), structural racism (Wolff et al, 2016), feminist theory (Riger, 2017), civil rights (Jenkins & Morris, 1984), disability rights (Charlton, 2000), LGBTQ rights (Samuels et al, 2019), and reproductive justice (Ross, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Justice and equity scholars often focus on the moral discourse of the role of societies and governments to provide opportunities for all to thrive through work, play, and have a healthy life (Braveman & Suarez-Balcazar, 2009). Social justice conceptualizations have been informed by discourses on critical theory (de Vita, 2014), equity (Corning, 2015), social and economic injustice, and structural racism (Wolff, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%