2019
DOI: 10.1590/1981-22562019022.190045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol for the evaluation of chewing among older adults

Abstract: Objectives : To evaluate the functional and physiological structures of the stomatognathic system of the oral cavity of older adults based on self-perception, comparing the same with a professional clinical evaluation, and investigating the difficulties encountered when chewing. Method : An analytical cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was conducted with a sample of 53 older adults aged 60 to 90 years. A protocol consisting of three questionnaires was used: a sociodemographic evaluation, a sel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3) were carried out in the Southeast (Lago et al, 2017;Amaral et al, 2018;Souza et al, 2019), 33.3% (n = 2) in the South (Pauli et al, 2018;Gomes & Castelo, 2019) and only 16.6 % (n = 1) in the Northeast region (Lages et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3) were carried out in the Southeast (Lago et al, 2017;Amaral et al, 2018;Souza et al, 2019), 33.3% (n = 2) in the South (Pauli et al, 2018;Gomes & Castelo, 2019) and only 16.6 % (n = 1) in the Northeast region (Lages et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the selected articles (66.6%; n = 4) stated the location of data collection was in hospitals (Lages et al, 2017;Amaral et al, 2018;Gomes & Castelo, 2019;Souza et al, 2019). In relation to the other articles, one was carried out in a long-term institution (Lago et al, 2017) and another in selected rural and urban areas of a city, by home visits (Pauli et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations