2020
DOI: 10.1590/198055272416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estado E Desenvolvimento Na América Latina

Abstract: RESUMO Este trabalho foi escrito em atendimento a uma solicitação da CEPAL, com o objetivo de sugerir - de forma sintética - algumas premissas para um novo programa de pesquisa sobre o tema do estado e do desenvolvimento na América Latina. Primeiro, ele resume as principais posições do debate clássico sobre este tema, do período áureo do desenvolvimentismo latino-americano, entre os anos 1950 e 1970 do século passado. E logo depois sugere uma nova perspectiva, e uma rediscussão da questão do desenvolvimento, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, in the context of the National Development Strategy, the trajectory of that country/economy in terms of technology, technological training and technological development must be configured, in an intimate relationship and intense interaction with the industrial apparatus installed there and in the center of a synergistic-interactive relationship between the spheres of Public Policy respectively related to the industrial area and the technological component [9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, in the context of the National Development Strategy, the trajectory of that country/economy in terms of technology, technological training and technological development must be configured, in an intimate relationship and intense interaction with the industrial apparatus installed there and in the center of a synergistic-interactive relationship between the spheres of Public Policy respectively related to the industrial area and the technological component [9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of "three interpretations" is synthesized by Bresser-Pereira (2010), who divides them into cepalina, Marxist and dependent-associated. Santos (2000), Martins (2006), andFiori (2020), despite the addition of some subdivisions 8 , make similar classifications, recognizing the existence of a reformist or structuralist tradition originating from ECLAC; a revolutionary, of Marxist inspiration; and an associated, inspired in the liberal ideas. More precisely, Katz (2016) and Rodrigues (2020) reaffirm the existence of three main lines of Latin American thought on development today: Katz divides them into neoliberalism, socialism, and neodevelopmentism, while Rodrigues writes about "three typologies" and adopts the terms cepalina, Marxist and associated.…”
Section: Debates On Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%