2021
DOI: 10.1590/1980-57642021dn15-020008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tertiary center referral delay of patients with dementia in Southern Brazil: associated factors and potential solutions

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Early dementia diagnosis has many benefits and is a priority. In Brazil, most cases are diagnosed by a specialist. Objective: We aimed to study the average time from disease onset to specialist assessment and related factors; we also propose potential strategies to deal with this delay. Methods: This was a cross-sectional database study in 245 patients with dementia from an outpatient clinic in a tertiary university hospital in Southern Brazil, which only assesses individuals from the Unified Hea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, most of the patients had moderate dementia (CDR = 2). Although we know that patients with dementia usually have a diagnostic delay in Brazil 29 , we could not assess whether this delay was associated with our results. We also found 3 patients with CDR = 0 receiving AD medication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, most of the patients had moderate dementia (CDR = 2). Although we know that patients with dementia usually have a diagnostic delay in Brazil 29 , we could not assess whether this delay was associated with our results. We also found 3 patients with CDR = 0 receiving AD medication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These findings, which mimic our own, may indicate that specialized referral protocols in the Brazilian SUS require prompt revision to lessen the burden on secondary and tertiary services and reduce delays in patient care. ( 27 , 28 )…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%