2017
DOI: 10.1590/1980-57642016dn11-030005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brazilian transcultural adaptation of an instrument on communicative strategies of caregivers of elderly with dementia

Abstract: Communication with patients with dementia may be a difficult task for caregivers.OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to produce a Brazilian transcultural adaptation of an instrument developed in Canada, called the Small Communication Strategies Scale, composed of 10 items constructed from 10 communicative strategies most recurrent in a literature survey.METHODS:Drawing on understanding of the construction of the Small Communication Strategies Scale (SCSS), a Brazilian Portuguese version of the instrument was d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The communicative strategies used by caregivers were assessed by Small Communication Strategies Scale. This scale was constructed from the scale used by Small and Gutman, which was adapted to Portuguese by Delfino et al For the present study, we included seven more communicative strategies considered functional in a systematic review carried out by Delfino and Cachioni: (i) reduce or adjust the environmental stimulation to eliminate agitation; (ii) avoiding techniques of reality orientation; (iii) provide verbal and non‐verbal support; (iv) use the solution‐oriented approach; (v) do not confront the older adult; (vi) use language in an appropriate way, in which the older adult is able to understand; and (vii) communicate in a non‐infantilized and non‐controlling manner . The caregivers were asked to indicate how often they used each strategy when communicating with the person with AD by checking one of the five options: always, often, occasionally, rarely or never.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The communicative strategies used by caregivers were assessed by Small Communication Strategies Scale. This scale was constructed from the scale used by Small and Gutman, which was adapted to Portuguese by Delfino et al For the present study, we included seven more communicative strategies considered functional in a systematic review carried out by Delfino and Cachioni: (i) reduce or adjust the environmental stimulation to eliminate agitation; (ii) avoiding techniques of reality orientation; (iii) provide verbal and non‐verbal support; (iv) use the solution‐oriented approach; (v) do not confront the older adult; (vi) use language in an appropriate way, in which the older adult is able to understand; and (vii) communicate in a non‐infantilized and non‐controlling manner . The caregivers were asked to indicate how often they used each strategy when communicating with the person with AD by checking one of the five options: always, often, occasionally, rarely or never.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performing only cross-cultural translation and adaptation is common in the scientific literature. 24 , 28 , 29 However, these procedures are only the first phase in properly ascertaining the validity of these questionnaires. Therefore, we recommend that further studies should be conducted to verify the psychometric properties of SEFIP-dance in Brazilian Portuguese and SEFIP-sport in Brazilian Portuguese and English.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Small Communication Strategies Scale (SCSS) is a 17-item questionnaire that measures the frequency in which the caregiver uses communicative strategies to relate to family members with dementia. It was constructed from the scale used by Small and Gutman (2002), which was adapted to Portuguese (Delfino, Komatsu, Komatsu, Neri, & Cachioni, 2017). For this study, we included seven more communicative strategies considered functional in a systematic review conducted by Delfino and Cachioni (2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%