2017
DOI: 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v37n4p771-781/2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Variability in Active Reflectance Sensor-Measured Ndvi in Soybean and Wheat Crops

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Optimization of N management is one of the great challenges to be overcome in grain production, as it is directly related to productivity and can also cause environmental damage. Precision agriculture aims to solve this problem by applying nitrogen fertilizer at varying rates. Reflectance sensors are instruments capable of estimating N needs in various crops, including grain crops. However, it is not clear how these sensors perform under varying solar radiation and cloud cover, due to a lack of resear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values for solar radiation during the readings at three heights (0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 m) ( Figures 3b, 3d, 3f, 3h, and 3j) show a greater variation of amplitude and were smaller during the first hours of the morning and the end of the afternoon; visually, however, it can be seen that these values were not significantly different among sensor heights. When the radiation readings were compared to the NDVI readings (Figures 3a, 3c, 3e, 3g and 3i), the NDVI showed inverse behavior compared to the radiation; that is, the higher the incidence of solar radiation the lower the NDVI, which was a result similar to that found by Souza et al (2010), Rahman et al (2015), and Beneduzzi et al (2017). An exception was stage 8 wheat, which was probably due to cloud cover.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The values for solar radiation during the readings at three heights (0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 m) ( Figures 3b, 3d, 3f, 3h, and 3j) show a greater variation of amplitude and were smaller during the first hours of the morning and the end of the afternoon; visually, however, it can be seen that these values were not significantly different among sensor heights. When the radiation readings were compared to the NDVI readings (Figures 3a, 3c, 3e, 3g and 3i), the NDVI showed inverse behavior compared to the radiation; that is, the higher the incidence of solar radiation the lower the NDVI, which was a result similar to that found by Souza et al (2010), Rahman et al (2015), and Beneduzzi et al (2017). An exception was stage 8 wheat, which was probably due to cloud cover.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The sensor performs ten (10) readings per second, and 100 readings per position were performed, and the mean was calculated. Several authors, such as Souza et al (2010) and Beneduzzi et al (2017) have already observed the effect of the reading time of an active reflectance sensor. Therefore, is decided to perform readings during the day, from 7 am to 7 pm with a 30minute interval between the readings, for a total of 25 samples for each position.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further study to characterize view angle effects at the scale of forest canopies may benefit from alternative sensor placement. In this study, the Unispec-DC instrument was placed on the south side of the tower, preventing observation of the hot spot where view angle effects on reflectance and spectral indices are most severe (Beneduzzi et al, 2017;Gamon et al, 2006). The hot spot, or 10.1029/2020JG005774…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensor was mounted on a telescoping handheld pole and held horizontally above the canopy while measuring. Measurements were taken within 2 h from local solar noon to minimize influences by solar irradiation differences [35]. For T. cordata, due to stem length increases, measurements with the GreenSeeker were only possible in 2016.…”
Section: Optical Measurements At Canopy Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%