1979
DOI: 10.1590/1809-43921979094645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of the vegetation of a white-sand black-water igapó (Rio Negro, Brazil)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
6

Year Published

1982
1982
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
23
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are comparable to varzea soil properties reported from the Brazilian Amazon by Furch (1997). Keel and Prance (1979) this forest was erroneously classified as igapo: the correct classification is varzea. c According to Klinge et al (1989) this forest was erroneously classified as varzea the right classification is igapo.…”
Section: Study Areasupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These results are comparable to varzea soil properties reported from the Brazilian Amazon by Furch (1997). Keel and Prance (1979) this forest was erroneously classified as igapo: the correct classification is varzea. c According to Klinge et al (1989) this forest was erroneously classified as varzea the right classification is igapo.…”
Section: Study Areasupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, in our study, the oligarchic structure (the concentration of IV in a few species plus many species of lesser importance) found is also common in tropical forest formations, especially in disturbed or early successional communities (Keel & Prance 1979, Campbell et al 1986, Pascal & Pélissier 1996, and in other open vegetation types marginal to the Atlantic rain forest (Scarano 2002). Nevertheless, diversity (H' = 3.07) is expectedly lower than that of Atlantic (e.g, Sanchez et al 1999) and Amazon rain forests (e.g, Campbell et al 1992), but surprisingly high considering the extreme environmental conditions these plants are often subjected to (e.g., Scarano et al 2005).…”
Section: Mssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Studies using multivariate techniques have further indicated that swamp forests differ floristically from flooded riparian forests, mainly due to differences in flooding regimes (Rodrigues & Nave 2004;Silva et al 2007). Even within a single site, differences in topography, flooding intensity and soil conditions affect the spatial distribution of species and promote phytosociological variation (Keel & Prance 1979;Vilela et al 2000;Sztutman & Rodrigues 2002;Damasceno-Junior et al 2005;Scarano 2006;Teixeira et al 2008). The floristic differences related to this great heterogeneity of ecological conditions were responsible for the low similarity between various Brazilian floodplain forests and the swamp forest studied here, as well as for the relatively high species richness found in our study area, in comparison with other swamps (Tab.…”
Section: Phytogeographic Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 60%