2010
DOI: 10.1590/1808-1657v77p0112010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudo Comparativo Entre Os Testes Adotados Pelo Pncebt Para O Diagnóstico Sorológico Da Brucelose Em Bovinos

Abstract: RESUMO Avaliaram-se comparativamente as provas do antígeno acidificado tamponado (AAT), a combinação das provas de soroaglutinação lenta e 2-mercaptoetanol (2-ME) e a reação de fixação de complemento (RFC), provas preconizadas pelo Programa Nacional de Controle e Erradicação de Brucelose Tuberculose (PNCEBT). Para tanto, foram alisadas 1.061 amostras de soros bovinos. Os dados foram analisados pelo indicador kappa, adotando-se como ponto de corte o título 25 no 2-ME e 4 na RFC. Constatou-se sensibilidade relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of false-negative results is usually due to prozone phenomena, which, in turn, can be reduced by serum dilution or retesting after some time or by performing a more specific and confirmatory test such as the FC ( Organização Mundial da Saúde Animal, 2018 ). In a study conducted by Meirelles-Bartoli and Mathias (2010) , the authors reported relative sensitivity values of 99.6%, 98.8%, and 91.1%, respectively, for AAT, 2-ME, and FC. The comparison between the three tests adopted by the program highlighted a good agreement between the Acidified Buffered Antigen (AAT) and the confirmatory tests (2-ME, with Kappa = 0.80; and FC, with Kappa= 0.73).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of false-negative results is usually due to prozone phenomena, which, in turn, can be reduced by serum dilution or retesting after some time or by performing a more specific and confirmatory test such as the FC ( Organização Mundial da Saúde Animal, 2018 ). In a study conducted by Meirelles-Bartoli and Mathias (2010) , the authors reported relative sensitivity values of 99.6%, 98.8%, and 91.1%, respectively, for AAT, 2-ME, and FC. The comparison between the three tests adopted by the program highlighted a good agreement between the Acidified Buffered Antigen (AAT) and the confirmatory tests (2-ME, with Kappa = 0.80; and FC, with Kappa= 0.73).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%