Impacts of the regulatory model for market risk capital: application in a special savings company, an insurance company, and a pension fund

Abstract

In line with the regulation brought in by Solvency II, the Superintendence of Private Insurance (Susep) introduced the market risk capital requirement at the end of 2015, with 50% of the minimum capital for this type of risk being required by December 31st 2016 and 100% the following year. This regulatory model consists of calculating parametric value at risk with a 99% confidence level and a three month time horizon, using the net exposure of expected cash flows from assets and liabilities and a covariance matrix updated with market data up to July 2014. One limitation of this regulatory approach is that the updating of the covariance matrix depends on prior approval by the National Council of Private Insurance, which can limit the frequency the covariance matrix is updated and the model’s adherence to the current market reality. As this matrix considers the period before the presidential election, the country’s loss of investment grade status, and the impeachment process, which all contributed to an increase in market volatility, this paper analyses the impacts of applying the regulatory model, considering the market volatility updated to December 31st 2015, for a special savings company (sociedade de capitalização), an insurance company, and an pension fund. Furthermore, the paper discusses the practical implications of the new market risk requirement for managing the investments of the entities supervised by Susep, listing the various assumptions that can be used in the regulated entities’ Asset and Liability Management decision models and possible trade-offs to be addressed in this process.

The actuarial science editorship of the Accounting & Finance Review: some general considerations

“…Beltrão and Sugahara (2017) elaborate specific mortality tables for federal government employees, a highly relevant topic for the Federal Civil Servants Pension Plan (Regime Próprio de Previdência Social -RPPS) of the Federal Government of Brazil and for the Foundation for Supplementary Civil Servant Pension Plan (Fundação de Previdência Complementar do Servidor Público -Funpresp). Chan and Marques (2017) address the topic of the regulation originating from Solvency II. Motivated by the introduction of regulatory capital by the Superintendence of Private Insurance (Superintendência de Seguros Privados -Susep), the authors study the effects on an insurance company, a private pensions company, and a special savings company.…”