2016
DOI: 10.1590/1807-7692bar2016160020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Consumer Decisions: The Conscious Use of Primes as Performance Enhancers

Abstract: Through this article we examine ways through which consumers can take advantage of marketers' priming attempts and make better decisions. Specifically, we investigate what happens when individuals are made aware of primes that may potentially improve their performance. Using an Embedded Figures Test, we demonstrate that individuals can be consciously primed into an analytic thinking mindset and perform better when they believe that the prime will enhance performance. Individuals are able to successfully ignore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following evidence supports the assumption that contrast effects can occur for goal-incongruent influences but do not occur for goal-congruent influences of which individuals are aware. When individuals actually trained for a task, they performed better when they were told that the training had a positive influence than when they were told that the training had a negative influence ( Nicolao et al, 2016 ). This suggests that individuals could counteract the actual positive influence from the training when they believed that the training had a negative influence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following evidence supports the assumption that contrast effects can occur for goal-incongruent influences but do not occur for goal-congruent influences of which individuals are aware. When individuals actually trained for a task, they performed better when they were told that the training had a positive influence than when they were told that the training had a negative influence ( Nicolao et al, 2016 ). This suggests that individuals could counteract the actual positive influence from the training when they believed that the training had a negative influence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, this effect only occurred when the training actually prepared individuals for the subsequent task. This rules out a mere placebo effect ( Nicolao et al, 2016 )—that is, an effect which cannot be attributed to an actual treatment but to individuals’ belief of being treated ( Fontaine et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%