2022
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate implants with buccal defects filled with bone from the tuberosity or a xenograft: 1-year randomized trial

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the use of autologous bone from tuberosity (TUBER) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in immediate implants with buccal bone defects. A total of 31 patients with one single tooth in the upper anterior region indicated for extraction presenting tomographic buccal bone defect were analyzed. Immediate implantation was conducted for all patients. In one group, DBBM and a collagen membrane were inserted into the buccal defect; in the other group, a small block of bone … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as shown in the present case, the missed buccal bone had not limited the implant placement, and the buccal bone reconstruction was performed immediately [2,28]. The reconstruction of the buccal bone wall using the tuberosity bone is limited to small bone defects and patients with sufficient mouth opening [29,30]. Besides, the use of an implant with surface treatment to accelerate the osseointegration process instead of using a machined titanium implant is also recommended [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, as shown in the present case, the missed buccal bone had not limited the implant placement, and the buccal bone reconstruction was performed immediately [2,28]. The reconstruction of the buccal bone wall using the tuberosity bone is limited to small bone defects and patients with sufficient mouth opening [29,30]. Besides, the use of an implant with surface treatment to accelerate the osseointegration process instead of using a machined titanium implant is also recommended [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%