2020
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective analysis of craniofacial soccer incidents during FIFA competitions: an observational study

Abstract: The aim of this prospective epidemiological study was to evaluate the occurrence of incidents involving the craniofacial region of soccer players during three official FIFA competitions. The craniofacial incidents were identified by video analysis of all 144 matches of two FIFA World Cups (2014/2018) and the 2017 FIFA Confederations Cup. Data collection included incident type, incident severity, site affected, incident cause and referee decision. The multivariate Poisson regression model was performed to analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of head and maxillofacial injuries during the World Cup and its preseason can be considered very low (5.69%) as stated before in the literature [1,12,15]. Approximately 9% to 18% [1,12,15] decreases to about 6%, but this can be explained since only injuries associated to athlete substitution or absence were included in the present report. Although few in number [1],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The frequency of head and maxillofacial injuries during the World Cup and its preseason can be considered very low (5.69%) as stated before in the literature [1,12,15]. Approximately 9% to 18% [1,12,15] decreases to about 6%, but this can be explained since only injuries associated to athlete substitution or absence were included in the present report. Although few in number [1],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Approximately 9% to 18% [1,12,15] decreases to about 6%, but this can be explained since only injuries associated to athlete substitution or absence were included in the present report. Although few in number [1],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations