2017
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analgesic effect of photobiomodulation therapy (830 nm) on the masticatory muscles: a randomized, double-blind study

Abstract: This study assesses the efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy (830 nm) for myalgia treatment of masticatory muscles. Sixty patients with muscular myalgia were selected and randomly allocated into 2 groups (n=30): Group A comprised patients given a placebo (control), and Group B consisted of those undergoing photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT). PBMT and placebo were applied bilaterally to specific points on the masseter and temporal muscles. Referred pain elicited by palpation and maximum mouth opening were meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
48
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This specific standardization is expected to increase the use of laser, as it potentializes the SLH treatment when associated with other conventional therapies in the field. It is also expected that further research will be conducted to find evidence in SLH clinic [14][15][16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This specific standardization is expected to increase the use of laser, as it potentializes the SLH treatment when associated with other conventional therapies in the field. It is also expected that further research will be conducted to find evidence in SLH clinic [14][15][16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, 44 out of 51 full text articles were included and analysed in the present systematic review . Furthermore, 32 out of 44 studies qualified for a meta-analysis [57,58,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74]77,78,81,[83][84][85][86]88,89,91,[95][96][97]99,100] (inter-reviewer agreement, κ = 1). The PRISMA flow diagram for search strategy utilised in the present systematic review and meta-analysis is illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size (n) distribution amongst the included studies was as follows; n > 50 in 10 studies [58,64,65,69,82,[89][90][91]93,98], n = 40-50 in 15 studies [59,61,62,67,68,70,73,[83][84][85]87,88,92,95,99], n = 30-40 in 7 studies [72,73,75,78,81,95,98], n = 20-30 in 7 studies [57,58,76,77,80,87,97] and n = 10-20 in 5 studies [61,64,67,79,82].…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then 55 potentially eligible articles were obtained by screening the titles and abstracts carefully. After careful full-text screening and assessment of the risk of bias, 20 RCTs met the inclusion criteria [4,10,12,15,28,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. This selection process and exclusion reasons were presented in the ow chart (Fig.…”
Section: Eligible Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%