2015
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2015.vol29.0085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and risk factors of non-carious cervical lesions related to occupational exposure to acid mists

Abstract: This study evaluates the prevalence and risk factors of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) in a Brazilian population of workers exposed and non-exposed to acid mists and chemical products. One hundred workers (46 exposed and 54 non-exposed) were evaluated in a Centro de Referência em Saúde do Trabalhador - CEREST (Worker's Health Reference Center). The workers responded to questionnaires regarding their personal information and about alcohol consumption and tobacco use. A clinical examination was conducted t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies showed that besides periodontal disease, occupational exposure to acid mist and acid solution may cause tooth damage [3,23,[25][26][27][28][29][30], especially tooth erosion [2]. In 2010, a Japanese study showed that the mean prevalence rate of tooth erosion among battery factory workers was 22.5%, which was also proportional to work history.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies showed that besides periodontal disease, occupational exposure to acid mist and acid solution may cause tooth damage [3,23,[25][26][27][28][29][30], especially tooth erosion [2]. In 2010, a Japanese study showed that the mean prevalence rate of tooth erosion among battery factory workers was 22.5%, which was also proportional to work history.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chinese reported a high prevalence of 60-80% while India had a range of 19-25%. [6][7][8]10,[13][14][15][16][17]19,21,22,25,26,28 Age and Gender Data Sevente en s tudies had note d the age range of the participants. 6 -8,10,11,13-17,19,21,22,24-26,28 The ages varied from schoolchildren (12-15 years) to middle age and elderly (60-69 years).…”
Section: Geographic Sample and Prevalence Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to use the 35-44 years age group in the sample size calculation because, according to national epidemiological surveys, this group is the one that best represents the "workers" category. The 65-74 years age group corresponds to elderly and retired individuals, and the preceding 15-19 years age group corresponds to adolescents 14 .…”
Section: Sample Size Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each 10 workers, one was reexamined to assess intra-examiner agreement 14 The workers responded to questionnaires regarding personal and social demographic information (name, age, gender, educational level, marital status), occupational information (exposure to acid mists and chemical products, income), reason for seeking assistance at the Worker's Health Reference Center and finally, questionnaires OHIP-14 16 and WAI 11 . In an interview with the investigator, the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) and the Fagerström Tolerance questionnaire were used to assess alcohol consumption and nicotine dependence 14 All workers were submitted to a clinical dental exam, which was performed on all teeth, including third molars (if present). The DMFT index was assessed in the examination, according to WHO criteria 15 Instruction for calculation of prevalence and extension of OHIP-14 are available at Slade et al 9…”
Section: Data Collection and Oral Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%