Antibiosis in soybean genotypes to Spodoptera cosmioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Queiroz, Erielma Borges de; Miranda, Débora de Souza; Silva, Franciele Cristina da; Borella, Célio; Almeida, André Cirilo de Sousa; Hirose, Edson; Jesus, Flávio Gonçalves de

doi:10.1590/1806-9665-rbent-2020-0010

Cited by 7 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 28 publications

(46 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The experiment was completely randomized with ten treatments (genotypes) and ten repetitions (individually separated larvae). The number of repetitions was based on previous studies (Freitas et al ., 2018; Queiroz et al ., 2020).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nutritional indices of S. frugiperda S. frugiperda larvae were fed with an artificial diet until the third larval instar, according to a methodology used in previous studies (Nogueira et al, 2019;Queiroz et al, 2020). Ten larvae were weighed to obtain initial weights and later individually separated into Petri dishes (9.0 cm in diameter) and kept in an airconditioned room (temperature: 25 ± 2°C, relative humidity: 60 ± 10%, and photophase 14 h) while feeding individually on each chickpea genotype.…”

Section: Growth and Survival Of S Frugiperdamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Antibiosis to Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in chickpea genotypes

Corrêa

Silva

Nascimento

et al. 2021

Bull. Entomol. Res.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) belong to the Fabaceae family and are one of the most grown crops in the world and an important source of protein for humans. Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a polyphagous pest that causes significant crop damage. The objective of this study was to examine antibiosis to S. frugiperda in chickpea genotypes. The following genotypes were studied: Jamu 96 and Blanco Sinaloa 92 (Mexico); Nacional 29 (Cuba); BG 1392 (Spain), and BRS Kalifa, BRS Cristalino, BRS Toro, Nacional 27, 004UP, 003UP, BRS Cícero, and BRS Aleppo (Brazil). The chickpea genotypes influenced the biological parameters of S. frugiperda, of which larval period, larval weight, and pupal period were most affected. Nacional 29 caused high mortality in the larval and pupal stages of S. frugiperda. The larvae on BRS Aleppo had the longest larval stage, lowest weight, and longest pupal stage. The genotypes Nacional 29, Nacional 27, and BRS Cícero showed antibiosis resistance to S. frugiperda. These genotypes could be used as a source of resistance to S. frugiperda in conjunction with other methods of pest control in integrated pest management programs for chickpea crops. These resistant genotypes could also be used as donor sources in breeding programs for insect resistance.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Growth and Survival Of S Frugiperdamentioning

confidence: 99%

Antibiosis to Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in chickpea genotypes

Corrêa

Silva

Nascimento

et al. 2021

Bull. Entomol. Res.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the quality of the food consumed by the adult stage can also influence its performance 23,24 . Although the host effect on development, reproduction and building up of reserves is more visible in monophagous insects, there are several studies with polyphagous insects, including S. cosmioides , which show the impact of host species on insect survival, biology and reproductive capacity and, in consequence, hosts can be sorted into different categories 15–19,25–29 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several studies have evaluated the suitability of different host species and their contribution to the population growth of pests, such as Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner), H. zea (Boddie) and Plutella xylostella (L.) 31,32 . For the Spodoptera genus, many studies have analyzed the impact of different host species to determine host‐plant quality and even predict the potential population growth 15,19,25,27–29,33–36 . However, these studies have focused only on the host agricultural crops, neglecting weeds that are often present in the soybean agroecosystem.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of genetically engineered soybean and Amaranthus weeds on biological and reproductive parameters of Spodoptera cosmioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Jerez

Hill

Pereira

et al. 2022

Pest Management Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: In soybean fields containing insecticide-and herbicide-resistant genetically engineered varieties, some weed species have increasingly become difficult to manage and may favor the population growth of secondary pests like Spodoptera cosmioides (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). To test this hypothesis, we measured life-history traits, population growth parameters and adult nutrient content of S. cosmioides reared on foliage from four Amaranthus species, from Cry1Ac Bt and non-Bt soybean varieties, and on meridic artificial diet. RESULTS: Larvae reared on A. palmeri and A. spinosus had a shorter development time (5-7 days) than larvae raised on the soybean varieties and A. hybridus. Armyworm survival probability was zero on A. viridis and highest (80% and 71%) on soybeans and A. palmeri. The latter and the artificial diet produced the heaviest larvae and pupae, in contrast to the non-Bt soybean variety. Body nutrient content diverged mostly for adults reared on artificial diet compared with those raised on the soybean varieties. The intrinsic rate of population increase (overall fitness) was 27.88% higher for the armyworms on A. palmeri, Cry1Ac Bt soybean and artificial diet compared with those on non-Bt soybean, A. spinosus and A. hybridus.CONCLUSIONS: Cry1Ac soybean fields infested by some Amaranthus weeds, especially A. palmeri, are conducive to the population growth of S. cosmioides. Integrated pest management programs may be needed to properly manage S. cosmioides in soybean fields, with surveillance for population peaks and judicious control measures when needed.

show abstract

“…There are three types of PRI: antixenosis, antibiosis and tolerance (Paiva et al, 2018). Antixenosis occurs when insects reduce feeding, oviposition, or shelter in a genotype (Queiroz et al, 2020). Antibiosis negatively affects an insect's biology/physiology by reducing weight, increasing mortality, prolonging life cycle, and reducing fertility (Smith and Clement, 2012;Seifi et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resistance of rice genotypes to fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Silva¹,

Corrêa²,

Almeida³

et al. 2021

Rev. Bras. entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Antibiosis in soybean genotypes to Spodoptera cosmioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Cited by 7 publications

References 28 publications

Antibiosis to Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in chickpea genotypes

Antibiosis to Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in chickpea genotypes

The role of genetically engineered soybean and Amaranthus weeds on biological and reproductive parameters of Spodoptera cosmioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Resistance of rice genotypes to fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About