Ecological impact and population status of non-native bees in a Brazilian urban environment

Abstract

The introduction of species is an important global threat to native ecosystems and yet little is known about invasion risks of non-native bees. Moreover, urbanization is increasing rapidly around the world with impact on the bee fauna. The city of Curitiba (Brazil) could be considered a model system for studies under this scope, with historical samplings and monitoring programs since the 1940s. This paper aims to quantify the current ecological impact of the non-native bee species present in Curitiba by using an integrative measure of impact and to define their current population status by classifying them into a unified framework for biological invasions. Ten sites were actively sampled in the metropolitan area of Curitiba during ten months. In addition to Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758, we found two others non-native species, Anthidium manicatum (Linnaeus, 1758) and Melipona scutellaris Latreille, 1811. None of them changed the native bee community structure, but they got different values of impact due to their ranges and abundances. While the honeybee is a known invasive species, A. manicatum was also considered invasive and has persisted in the city since the 1940s, interacting with the non-native plant Leonurus japonicus Houtt. M. scutellaris, a cultivated stingless bee species, had its first record for the city and fits the casual non-native category. We suggest monitoring the non-native bee species and actions centered on beekeepers to avoid future illegal introductions. The honey production or hobby interest on stingless bees can offer additional obstacles for species conservation when decoupled of scientific knowledge.

Urbanisation drivers and underlying mechanisms of terrestrial insect diversity loss in cities

“…Contrary to herbivores, most pollinators are generalist feeders and this may explain why exotic plants do not have consistent negative effects on this guild (Tallamy et al ., 2020). However, it should be noted that invasional meltdowns (i.e., a pair of non‐indigenous species that can facilitate one another's invasion in various ways) have recently been observed between exotic plant and pollinator species in urban settings (Graf et al ., 2020), with detrimental consequences in overall insect diversity.…”

The potential of iNaturalist for bee conservation research—A study case in a southern Brazilian metropolis

“…Mirim‐preguiça occurs naturally in southeastern Brazil and the bugia is distributed in the coastal Atlantic Forest, both without unmanaged nest records in Curitiba. The impact of cultivation of non‐native stingless bees in Curitiba was recently discussed by Graf et al (2020) in the first report of uruçu‐nordestina ( Melipona scutellaris ) in the region. It is a bigger problem in the country, at least 33 stingless bee species are commercialised in Brazil and several of those are illegally traded out of their native range (Carvalho, 2022; Santos et al, 2021).…”

Assessing the impact of alien bees on native ones

“…However, this result was explained by the generalist foraging behaviour of some insular native bees. In Brazil, a study conducted in an urban area found no impact from two alien bee species (Apis mellifera and Anthidium manicatum) on the structure of the native bee community (Graf et al, 2020), suggesting that no exploitative competition occurred. The authors proposed two hypotheses to explain this result.…”