The primacy of ultrasound in the assessment of muscle architecture: precision, accuracy, reliability of ultrasonography. Physiatrist, radiologist, general internist, and family practitioner's experiences

Abstract

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: With high-resolution real-time ultrasonography we investigated the muscle architectural parameters of vastus lateralis in healthy volunteers. PURPOSES: We determined the reproducibility and validity of ultrasonography and the role of the ultrasonographer in assessing muscle architecture. We proposed the most appropriate clinical parameters for objective measurements and an ultrasound protocol of muscle architecture. METHODS: We conducted an intraobserver and interobserver study. We investigated 21 healthy male volunteers. The subjects were independently evaluated by four different operators using high-resolution real-time ultrasonography. To assess the reproducibility of ultrasound examinations, four operators repeated measurements using the same ultrasound device. Muscle thickness, muscle volume, muscle fiber pennation angle, and subcutaneous adiposity of the vastus lateralis muscle were measured. RESULTS: Intra-observer (ICC 0.92-0.97), interobserver (ICC 0.78-0.92) reproducibility was good to excellent for all measurements. CONCLUSION: Simple, reproducible, non-invasive ultrasound measurements of muscle structure easily demonstrated differences in muscle morphology. With a protocol and with objective and repeatable measurements, sonographers from different backgrounds could obtain an objective measurement of ultrasound images with little differences and low variability in results, thanks to the upgrading of diagnostic ultrasound imaging and their clinical skills.

Ultrasound Biomarkers for Sarcopenia: What Can We Tell So Far?

“…in young individuals, [71][72][73] in post-stroke paretic and healthy limbs, 74 and others pointed out higher reproducibility in younger versus older subjects. 44 Although young and old subjects clearly differ, it can be argued that there is added difficulty in measuring small changes in already small PAs of sarcopenic muscle.…”

Diferencias de Sexo en Ecografía Muscular en Escolares Según Tercil de Nacimiento (Sex Differences in Muscle Ultrasound in Schoolchildren According to Birth Tertile)

“…Los valores utilizados para el análisis estadístico para el espesor muscular, y el ángulo de penneación fueron los promedios de las dos medidas de cada imagen. La fiabilidad de las medidas ecográficas utilizadas es alta (Barotsis et al, 2020;Chiaramonte et al, 2019). El coeficiente de variación de dos medidas en diferentes momentos, el mismo día, de diez sujetos fue para el espesor del 5,0 %, para la EI del 0,4% y para el ángulo de penneación el 0.8%.…”

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in the Field of Diabetology

“…The probe is positioned at half of the distance between the greater trochanter and the interarticular line of the knee, transversally to the muscle for measuring the thickness and cross-sectional area, and longitudinally for measuring the pennation angle (PA) in patients in prone position. Chiaramonte et al [65] have shown the accuracy, precision, and repeatability of US in assessing the muscle architecture between physiatrists, radiologists, and general internists, and the quadriceps femoris muscle thickness assessed by US is already used as a parameter for assessing the nutritional risk that is more accurate than serum levels of prealbumin, albumin, or transferrin that may vary with the intravascular volume excess, infection, and inflammation [66].…”