Cesarean delivery and small newborn for gestational age

Simões, Ricardo Santos; Bernardo, Wanderley Marques; Salomão, Antônio Jorge; Baracat, Edmund C.

doi:10.1590/1806-9282.62.01.16

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a literature review conducted by the Brazilian Medical Association, with the objective of updating the indication for cesarean section and verifying neonatal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in relation to smallfor-gestational-age pregnancies, it showed that there is insufficient evidence to recommend planned cesarean section in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies. 20 Regarding the comparison of PFF and type of parturition, we demonstrated in this study that women who underwent cesarean had a higher PFF compared to those who chose natural. Barbosa et al,4 in their study, analyzed the influence of the route of parturition on pelvic floor strength; the test used in their study was the same used in ours, and their data agree with our results when they conclude that in their sample vaginal partum decreased PFF in primiparous women when compared to cases that underwent cesarean section and to nulliparous women.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation and Comparison of Respiratory Muscular Strength, Functionality, and Pelvic Floor in the Immediate Postpartum of Normal and Cesarean Birth

Rosa

Dockhorn

Cardoso

et al. 2023

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate and compare peripheral, pelvic floor, respiratory muscle strength, and functionality in the immediate puerperium of normal delivery and cesarean section. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that verified respiratory, pelvic floor, peripheral, and functional muscle strength through manovacuometry, pelvic floor functional assessment (PFF), dynamometry, and the Time Up and Go (TUG) test, respectively. The groups were divided according to the type of delivery, into a cesarean section group and a normal parturition group. Results: The sample was composed of 72 postpartum puerperae, 36 of normal parturition, and 36 of cesarean section, evaluated before hospital discharge, mean age ranged from 25.56 ± 6.28 and 28.57 ± 6.47 years in puerperae of normal parturition and cesarean section respectively. Cesarean showed higher pelvic floor strength (PFF) compared to normal parturition (p < 0.002), but puerperae from normal delivery showed better functionality (p < 0.001). As for peripheral muscle strength and respiratory muscle strength, there was no significance when comparing the types of parturirion. Conclusion: There is a reduction in pelvic muscle strength in puerperae of normal delivery and a decrease in functionality in puerperae of cesarean section.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation and Comparison of Respiratory Muscular Strength, Functionality, and Pelvic Floor in the Immediate Postpartum of Normal and Cesarean Birth

Rosa

Dockhorn

Cardoso

et al. 2023

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the absence of other obstetric indications requiring CS, there is no sufficient evidence to recommend planned CS in the pregnancy with SGA aiming to reduce neonatal and perinatal morbidity and mortality [32]. However the present CS rate increased from 0.04% (two women) to 0.3% (19 women) with p = 0.000.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 70%

Cesarean section: Where are we are now? A comparative study between 1997-1998 and 2015-2016 at a tertiary teaching hospital in a developing country

Basha¹,

Falayleh²,

Jabra³

et al. 2019

Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The continued rise in caesarean section deliveries (CS) raises a major public health concern worldwide; our aim is to evaluate trends and determinants this increase, comparing indications between 1997 and 1998 (group A) and 2015 and 2016 (group B). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Jordan University Hospital analyzing all indications of CSs. Each delivery was assigned to the primary indication noted for that pregnancy. Results: The CS rate gradually rose from 22% in group A to 62%, and to 65% in group B. The leading indications for the increase rate of CS across the years were previous ≥ 2 CS, followed by decreasing rate of trial of previous uterine scar, non-reassuring fetal heart pattern, breech presentation, twin pregnancies, obstructed labor, and placenta previa. Conclusion: CS rates increased over the last 20 years. The appropriate way is to deal with this trend, is to reduce the primary section.

show abstract

Obstetric and antenatal risk factors for intrauterine growth restriction

Hromova

Berezhna

2020

ZMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Цель работы-оценить особенности акушерского и антенатального анамнеза, течение беременности и состояние новорожденных для определения факторов риска задержки внутриутробного роста плода (ЗВУРП). Материалы и методы. В ретроспективный анализ включены 63 женщины, родившие детей с диагнозом ЗВУРП (основная группа), и 63 женщины, родившие детей с нормальными антропометрическими показателями (контрольная группа). У

show abstract

Cesarean delivery and small newborn for gestational age

Cited by 4 publications

References 6 publications

Evaluation and Comparison of Respiratory Muscular Strength, Functionality, and Pelvic Floor in the Immediate Postpartum of Normal and Cesarean Birth

Evaluation and Comparison of Respiratory Muscular Strength, Functionality, and Pelvic Floor in the Immediate Postpartum of Normal and Cesarean Birth

Cesarean section: Where are we are now? A comparative study between 1997-1998 and 2015-2016 at a tertiary teaching hospital in a developing country

Obstetric and antenatal risk factors for intrauterine growth restriction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About