2022
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of left ventricular ejection function decline in young patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:A decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40%) in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is a significant predictor of mortality in the young ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction population. In this study, we aimed to investigate the predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction reduction and evaluate the long-term mortality rates in young ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with or without decreased left ventricular ejection fraction. METHODS:… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
22
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the higher the MIRI manifestation grade, the lower were the LVEF and LVFS, indicating that the higher the MIRI manifestation grade, the more obvious was the left ventricular systolic dysfunction. In a recent study of young STEMI patients, lesion localization (LAD lesion, proximal lesion), no-reflow, and prolonged ischemic time appeared to be important determinants of LVEF decline 22 , which was slightly different from our results, considering that this may have been caused by population characteristics. Notably, no-reflow plays a significant role in predicting the prognosis of patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the higher the MIRI manifestation grade, the lower were the LVEF and LVFS, indicating that the higher the MIRI manifestation grade, the more obvious was the left ventricular systolic dysfunction. In a recent study of young STEMI patients, lesion localization (LAD lesion, proximal lesion), no-reflow, and prolonged ischemic time appeared to be important determinants of LVEF decline 22 , which was slightly different from our results, considering that this may have been caused by population characteristics. Notably, no-reflow plays a significant role in predicting the prognosis of patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These conflicting results may be due to allelic heterogeneity, case‒control selection criteria, and different population backgrounds. In addition, the development of cardiovascular events may be determined by multiple genetic factors and environmental factors [ 25 , 26 ], rather than single-gene polymorphism of P2Y12 [ 1 , 27 ], with regard to the complexity of atherosclerosis etiology. Therefore, it may be crucial to analyze the effects of gene‒gene interactions and gene‒environment interactions on AMI risk in further studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomarkers such as C-reactive protein were not included in this study. The C-reactive protein level in patients with STEMI has been reported to be an independent predictor of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction [ 23 ] and all-cause mortality [ 24 ] in young patients with STEMI. Further analysis including C-reactive protein can be conducted in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%