Revisiting and comparing the Carnot Cycle and the Otto Cycle

Abstract

The reversibility of the Carnot Cycle makes it the most efficient thermodynamic cycle to convert energy as heat into work operating between two thermal reservoirs at different temperatures. The Otto cycle represents an idealization of the processes in the spark-ignition 4-stroke internal combustion engine operation. Some aspects of these two crucial thermodynamic cycles will be presented here in a comparative manner. This highlights why the Carnot Cycle does not offer advantages over the Otto Cycle in the operation of real thermal engines when we consider the efficiency and work done per cycle dependent on the compression ratio of the cycles.